Riddle: The World’s Simplest Card Trick

Class Activities
Exemplary Reflective Statement
Exemplary Reflective Statement 2
Exemplary Reflective Statement 3
- Invitation to post at Rate My Professor
- Follow this link directly to David Hodges
- If asked for a Course Code, use COMP 2 SP24
- Preview of Portfolio Readiness
- We’ll spend time together on this
- You’ve already started to build your Portfolio
- Don’t worry.
- You can still revise everything.
- Give every Portfolio item a Title.

Review Citations
- Review your In-text citations for compliance.
- They need Author or Title or Publication (or any combination), Said language, and a Quotation, Paraphrase, or Summary.
- NO PARENTHETICAL AUTHOR NOTATIONS.
This is INCORRECT:
NO PARENTHETICAL AUTHOR NOTATIONS.
This is CORRECT:
Make Separate posts for Short Arguments
First the Initial Post

Then a New Post for the Revised Argument
(Shows Responsiveness to Feedback)

Check Bibliography for Compliance
Entries need APA Bibliographic notations,
Links to the Sources,
and thorough descriptions of Background Material and How I Used it.

Check Reflective Statement for Compliance
Entries must specific descriptions of changes you made to your work in response
to feedback or detailed descriptions of how you met course objectives.
Make references and links to the posts that best demonstrate
your accomplishment of the Core Values.

Feedback Protocol
- If you’re posting arguments for the first time, you’re too late to request Feedback.
- If you posted weeks ago but never asked for Feedback, you’re too late to request Feedback.
- If you’re already engaged in feedback on an assignment, you can request additional feedback by making substantial revisions to your post, asking specific questions in a Reply, and placing your post in Feedback Please.
Grade Please Protocol
- If you’re posting an assignment for the first time, drop a Reply to alert your beloved professor to its existence. Ask for a Grade. Put the post in the Grade Please category.
- If you’ve never received a grade on an assignment, likely you professor has not noticed it. Drop a Reply to alert your beloved professor to its existence. Ask for a Grade. Put the post in the Grade Please category.
- If you’ve improved your post since it was first graded, drop a Reply to ask for a Regrade. Put the post in the Grade Please category.
Define a Kilogram
Exercise
Preview: WED NOV 29 Scholarship Revisions
- Grade Levels 2
- An “in reverse” unpacking of dense, content-rich statements into their component parts: backwards advice.
- Stephen Hawking Was Wrong
- Revision advice on how to grab reader attention with bold claims you can actually support.
- A Good Model for Citation and References
- BeezKneez has updated the in-text citations and References section to meet our class standards (even gone beyond our class standards for linking text to the sources).
- Building Refutation Language into your Refutations
- This links to the same post by BeezKneez as the Citation model above. Read the feedback chain for examples of “refuting while reporting” on the claims made by your “opponent.”
-
Reducing Jargon: Korean pop boy bands
-
Syntax is Argument: Magical Dependency
The more history we have about how things occur, the range of possible outcomes can be predicted with some kind of sense.
The odds of existing are insurmountable, so appreciate your life. The more generations you go back, the higher the odds are of you existing.
Everyday is full of the impossible.
Our reflective statement is a persuasive argument.
The reflective statement needs to be research specific; if you haven’t addressed your thesis topic in your reflective statement, you’re failing.
You can’t command a place on the conference chart until Wednesday.
LikeLike
LikeLike
-Riddle: As cards are shuffled more and more, the odds increase in being less likely to get the same combo. This is with no training or practice. It takes a lot of luck the more the cards are shuffled. The odds, in a way, become almost impossible to get the same order of how they first were or how they were put together.
LikeLike
-The riddle for today was the card trick. It is demonstrating the statement “what are the odds”
-The reflective statements are persuasive arguments. We have to persuade our audience that we met the core values. We have to tell the audience what it was that we were studying.
-Wait until Wednesday to put your name down for the last conference to discuss grades.
LikeLike
riddle : card trick , it shows that “the odds” arent really important.
We looked at good reflective statement examples, they are persuasive arguments
Discussed portfolio information- we can still rewrite but everything should be in.
wednesday is when you should sign up for conference
LikeLike
LikeLike
randomness is an unsolved problem in computer science
there are 52! ways to shuffle a deck of 52 cards, a number we cant wrap our heads around
the guy who sent mail to a million people repeatedly sent back to the winners, making it seem as though he was correct all the time even though he didnt actually know who would win
LikeLike
Randomness is the measure of entropy in the universe or the measure of chaos. (this is what biology/chemistry/science says)
Cards and probability of certain things in life happening is astronomically low
LikeLike
-We talked about odd and we were passed around playing cards and shuffled it and with that it was an example of the odd of a person getting the same deck as the other. We were also told a very interesting story of how the chess game started.
-Core Values we went over how they were supposed to be written and great examples were shown on how to write a good reflective statement.
The reflective statement goes into your portfolio grade and your portfolio grade is around 70% of your grade and its important to turn everything in the class which is important
-We went to rate my professor and went to give some feedback on how we rate the class and how the class was for us.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Riddle: The world’s simplest card trick
The Shah of Persia wanted someone to make a game for him. As a reward the person asked for a seemingly tiny reward. He wanted one piece of rice placed on the first square of a chess board; each space would contain double the previous one. This turned out to be an immensely large number. This story demonstrates how quickly factorials become massive.
The common theme of the effective reflection statement was that the students stated a problem they had during the semester and then described how they overcame it. They were all clear on what that problem was.
There are eight items required for the portfolio. One of our short arguments and its respective rewrite will be left out.
LikeLike
If I understand correctly, your question is whether prior conditions permit or prohibit randomness from following. In the case of the card deck, there must be physical explanations for how every card ended up where it did including the shuffler’s musculature, the thickness of the cards, their slipperiness, and on . . .
Given all the conditions, the cards had to end up as they did . . .
But, how does that impact the nature of randomness?
My question is a different one. Imagine that of all the 52! possibilities for the end-state of the deck after 7 shuffles, they fall back into their original ordered sets, separated by suits and numerical. Would we call the result random? Or, by random, do we simply mean “out of order” or “reasonably out of order”? How much numericality would we accept?
In Vegas, the standard is 7 shuffles. But what’s “non-random” about a deck that’s been shuffled 6 times, or 5, or just once?
5/3
LikeLike