Class 26: MON APR 22

Riddle: The World’s Simplest Card Trick

Class Activities

Exemplary Reflective Statement

Exemplary Reflective Statement 2

Exemplary Reflective Statement 3

  • Invitation to post at Rate My Professor
    1. Follow this link directly to David Hodges
    2. If asked for a Course Code, use COMP 2 SP24
  • Preview of Portfolio Readiness
    1. We’ll spend time together on this
    2. You’ve already started to build your Portfolio
  • Don’t worry.
    1. You can still revise everything.
  • Give every Portfolio item a Title.
Argument Title

Review Citations

  1. Review your In-text citations for compliance.
    1. They need Author or Title or Publication (or any combination), Said language, and a QuotationParaphrase, or Summary.
    2. NO PARENTHETICAL AUTHOR NOTATIONS.


This is INCORRECT:
nONCOMPLIANT apa

NO PARENTHETICAL AUTHOR NOTATIONS.
This is CORRECT:
Compliant APA

Make Separate posts for Short Arguments
First the Initial Post

Causal Argument

Then a New Post for the Revised Argument
(Shows Responsiveness to Feedback)

Causal Rewrite

Check Bibliography for Compliance
Entries need APA Bibliographic notations, 
Links to the Sources,
and thorough descriptions of Background Material and How I Used it.

Bib

Check Reflective Statement for Compliance
Entries must specific descriptions of changes you made to your work in response
to feedback or detailed descriptions of how you met course objectives.
Make references and links to the posts that best demonstrate
your accomplishment of the Core Values.

Reflective

Feedback Protocol

  • If you’re posting arguments for the first time, you’re too late to request Feedback.
  • If you posted weeks ago but never asked for Feedback, you’re too late to request Feedback.
  • If you’re already engaged in feedback on an assignment, you can request additional feedback by making substantial revisions to your post, asking specific questions in a Reply, and placing your post in Feedback Please.

Grade Please Protocol

  • If you’re posting an assignment for the first time, drop a Reply to alert your beloved professor to its existence. Ask for a Grade. Put the post in the Grade Please category.
  • If you’ve never received a grade on an assignment, likely you professor has not noticed it. Drop a Reply to alert your beloved professor to its existence. Ask for a Grade. Put the post in the Grade Please category.
  • If you’ve improved your post since it was first graded, drop a Reply to ask for a Regrade. Put the post in the Grade Please category.

Define a Kilogram


Exercise

Preview: WED NOV 29 Scholarship Revisions

  • Grade Levels 2
    • An “in reverse” unpacking of dense, content-rich statements into their component parts: backwards advice.
  • Stephen Hawking Was Wrong
    • Revision advice on how to grab reader attention with bold claims you can actually support.
  • A Good Model for Citation and References
    • BeezKneez has updated the in-text citations and References section to meet our class standards (even gone beyond our class standards for linking text to the sources).
  • Building Refutation Language into your Refutations
    • This links to the same post by BeezKneez as the Citation model above. Read the feedback chain for examples of “refuting while reporting” on the claims made by your “opponent.”

12 Responses to Class 26: MON APR 22

  1. holistic25's avatar holistic25 says:

    The more history we have about how things occur, the range of possible outcomes can be predicted with some kind of sense.

    The odds of existing are insurmountable, so appreciate your life. The more generations you go back, the higher the odds are of you existing.

    Everyday is full of the impossible.

    Our reflective statement is a persuasive argument.

    The reflective statement needs to be research specific; if you haven’t addressed your thesis topic in your reflective statement, you’re failing.

    You can’t command a place on the conference chart until Wednesday.

    Like

  2. ilovemydog's avatar ilovemydog says:
    • The impossible happens every day.
    • The chances of us all being here at the same time are slim, but we all happen to be here at the same time regardless of that chance. 
    • With our reflective statement, we need to persuade our readers that we mean our core values through our writing. 
    • Get the attention of your reader. 
    • On Wednesday, we will be going over our portfolios for a double-check. Then we can schedule our final grade conference. 

    Like

  3. Brandon Sigall's avatar eaglesfan says:

    -Riddle: As cards are shuffled more and more, the odds increase in being less likely to get the same combo. This is with no training or practice. It takes a lot of luck the more the cards are shuffled. The odds, in a way, become almost impossible to get the same order of how they first were or how they were put together.

    Like

  4. username1132005's avatar username1132005 says:

    -The riddle for today was the card trick. It is demonstrating the statement “what are the odds”  

    -The reflective statements are persuasive arguments. We have to persuade our audience that we met the core values. We have to tell the audience what it was that we were studying. 

    -Wait until Wednesday to put your name down for the last conference to discuss grades. 

    Like

  5. doglover7025's avatar doglover7025 says:

    riddle : card trick , it shows that “the odds” arent really important.

    We looked at good reflective statement examples, they are persuasive arguments

    Discussed portfolio information- we can still rewrite but everything should be in. 

    wednesday is when you should sign up for conference

    Like

  6. Snowman10's avatar Snowman10 says:

    1. Predicting Outcomes:
      • Understanding history helps predict possible outcomes.
      • Appreciate life as the odds of existing are incredibly slim.
    2. Reflective Statement:
      • Persuasive argument required.
      • Must address thesis topic or risk failing.
    3. Scheduling Conferences:
      • Can’t book a conference slot until Wednesday.
    4. Impossible Happens Every Day:
      • Despite slim odds, we all exist at the same time.
    5. Portfolios Review:
      • Double-check portfolios on Wednesday.
      • Schedule final grade conferences.
    6. Riddle – Card Trick:
      • Shuffling cards makes it unlikely to get the same order.
      • Demonstrates the concept of “what are the odds.”
    7. Reflective Statements:
      • Persuade readers that core values were met.
      • Clearly state the subject studied.

    Like

  7. temporal111's avatar temporal111 says:

    randomness is an unsolved problem in computer science

    there are 52! ways to shuffle a deck of 52 cards, a number we cant wrap our heads around

    the guy who sent mail to a million people repeatedly sent back to the winners, making it seem as though he was correct all the time even though he didnt actually know who would win

    Like

  8. Randomness is the measure of entropy in the universe or the measure of chaos. (this is what biology/chemistry/science says)

    Cards and probability of certain things in life happening is astronomically low

    Like

  9. The Gamer 2.0's avatar The Gamer 2.0 says:

    -We talked about odd and we were passed around playing cards and shuffled it and with that it was an example of the odd of a person getting the same deck as the other. We were also told a very interesting story of how the chess game started.

    -Core Values we went over how they were supposed to be written and great examples were shown on how to write a good reflective statement. 

    The reflective statement goes into your portfolio grade and your portfolio grade is around 70% of your grade and its important to turn everything in the class which is important

    -We went to rate my professor and went to give some feedback on how we rate the class and how the class was for us.

    Like

  10. Gymrat's avatar Gymrat says:
    • professor spoke about the odds of placing the cards the way we placed it and showed us how it would be the one and only time it would occur
    • told about the history of chess
    • cant schedule last conference until after Wednesday
    • revise everything and enjoy everything after this!

    Like

  11. toetio's avatar toetio says:

    Riddle: The world’s simplest card trick

    • The professor started the class by passing around a deck of cards and asking each of us to shuffle it.  Once the cards were shuffled, he arranged them on a desk.  He told us that based on math, the chance of ever seeing this exact arrangement of cards again is astronomically low.  This is an example of how unlikely things happen very often.
    • The fact that we exist is incredibly unlikely and an uncountable number of things had to happen for us to exist.
    • 52! Is an insanely large number
    • One thing the professor did bring up is what it means for something to be random.  The definition used in class was that something that is random is something with an outcome that cannot be manipulated.  That leads to a question, assuming something has a cause, for example, say there was a cause that led to the card’s being ordered the way they were.  With the knowledge of that cause could the results be repeated?

    The Shah of Persia wanted someone to make a game for him. As a reward the person asked for a seemingly tiny reward.  He wanted one piece of rice placed on the first square of a chess board; each space would contain double the previous one.  This turned out to be an immensely large number.  This story demonstrates how quickly factorials become massive.

    The common theme of the effective reflection statement was that the students stated a problem they had during the semester and then described how they overcame it.  They were all clear on what that problem was.

    There are eight items required for the portfolio.  One of our short arguments and its respective rewrite will be left out.

    Like

    • davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

      If I understand correctly, your question is whether prior conditions permit or prohibit randomness from following. In the case of the card deck, there must be physical explanations for how every card ended up where it did including the shuffler’s musculature, the thickness of the cards, their slipperiness, and on . . .

      Given all the conditions, the cards had to end up as they did . . .

      But, how does that impact the nature of randomness?

      My question is a different one. Imagine that of all the 52! possibilities for the end-state of the deck after 7 shuffles, they fall back into their original ordered sets, separated by suits and numerical. Would we call the result random? Or, by random, do we simply mean “out of order” or “reasonably out of order”? How much numericality would we accept?

      In Vegas, the standard is 7 shuffles. But what’s “non-random” about a deck that’s been shuffled 6 times, or 5, or just once?

      5/3

      Like

Leave a reply to thatpersonoverthere Cancel reply