Riding the Waves of Sustainability:
Can Renewable Energy Solutions Save the Day?
Over time, the creative spirit of humanity has changed in tandem with the demands and goals of society. Our creative expressions, which reflect our experiences and values, have frequently served useful purposes, from intricate temple designs to prehistoric cave art. The search for sustainable energy sources in the modern era, like biomass burning alongside coal and wave energy, is a reflection of this constant process of innovation and adaptation.
As a renewable energy source, wave energy—derived from the regular motion of ocean waves—has a lot of potential. Using wave energy provides a sustainable substitute for fossil fuels, which are increasingly becoming less and less common as we strive to fight climate change. Wave motion is a consistent and plentiful energy source that can be transformed into electricity using state-of-the-art technologies. By utilizing this enormous resource, we can lessen our reliance on finite fossil fuels and cut back on harmful emissions, protecting the environment for coming generations.
In a similar vein, sustainable cofiring, which combines biomass and coal to generate electricity, provides a means of producing energy in a more environmentally friendly manner. Biomass offers a renewable alternative to coal, derived from organic materials such as wood and agricultural residues. The integration of biomass into coal-fired power plants can effectively reduce carbon emissions and mitigate the ecological consequences associated with energy production. This strategy encourages the wise use of natural resources while simultaneously battling climate change.
The incorporation of biomass cofiring and wave energy into our energy landscape represents humankind’s dedication to environmental stewardship and sustainability. These cutting-edge innovations highlight our shared commitment to addressing the pressing issues brought on by ecological degradation and climate change. We can move toward a cleaner, more sustainable energy future and protect the health of our planet for future generations by investing in renewable energy solutions.
In addition, the development and implementation of these renewable energy technologies present opportunities for innovation as well as financial gains. Investments made by the public and private sectors in renewable energy infrastructure promote employment growth and advance technology. For skilled workers, the renewable energy sector offers a wide range of opportunities in manufacturing, engineering, and research and development. Adopting renewable energy helps to reduce the effects of climate change while simultaneously promoting global prosperity and economic growth.
In summary, sustainable biomass cofiring and wave energy are game-changing answers to today’s problems. These green energy innovations perfectly capture our continuous quest for resilient environments and sustainable development. We can steer towards a more equitable and clean energy landscape that benefits the planet and its inhabitants by utilizing the power of waves and biomass. We can fully utilize renewable energy and steer the world toward a better future for everybody if we work together and are committed to the same goals.
References
Agenda, F. (2022, March 22). Wave energy: Can Ocean power solve the global energy crisis? World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/03/wave-energy-ocean-electricity-renewables/
Demirbaş, A. (2003). Sustainable cofiring of biomass with coal. Energy Conversion and Management, 44(9), 1465–1479. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-8904(02)00144-9
How artificial intelligence can improve wind energy efficiency. Energy5. (2023, December 5). https://energy5.com/the-role-of-artificial-intelligence-in-optimizing-wind-turbine-performance-and-international-standards
Hey, Snowman! Thank you for requesting Feedback.
I’ve altered the style of your Title and streamlined your References section.
I hope I got them all in good shape.
WordPress gets very confused by imports of “Preformatted Text” and strenuously resists any attempt to unformat them. Whenever possible, if you’re importing references, bring them in as text only.
Now, down to business. 🙂
LikeLike
1. I made some style revisions already, to your Title and the word “References.” Please observe these changes and incorporate them into future essays.
2. MAKE NO CHANGES TO THIS POST YOURSELF.
3. WHY?
4. BECAUSE YOU’LL NEED A CLEAN FIRST DRAFT FOR YOUR PORTFOLIO.
5. INSTEAD . . .
6. Copy and paste the complete contents of this post into a new post you will call Definition Rewrite—Snowman.
7. Make all your revisions to the NEW POST.
8. At the end of the semester, you’ll put BOTH the original draft AND the rewrite into your Portfolio to demonstrate that you revised your work in response to feedback.
9. I’ll leave the first round of feedback here.
10. But all the rest of our business will take place on the Rewrite.
LikeLike
First of all, I appreciate the short, chunky size of your paragraphs. I assume that’s in response to my suggestion that paragraphs should be the size of one Main Idea. It’s not a hard rule, mind you, just a guideline. If your idea needs 300 words, so be it. But most paragraphs of that length contain more than one and have natural breaks.
Second, you don’t appear to have nearly 1000 words here in your body text. For now, I’ll operate under the theory that you’re very concise in conveying your complex ideas. Let’s find out.
LikeLike
—On a technical level, this is beautifully phrased, Snowman, but the point is buried and the emphasis is peculiar.
—Judging from the next paragraph, this one should emphasize the emergence of “wave energy” as a breakthrough creative expression, but it doesn’t.
—Your evocation of cave art and temple “designs,” whatever that means, don’t serve any “useful purposes” that you’ve identified. If they do, great, but it’s your job to mention them.
—Yes, the “search for energy” reflects “innovation,” but your claim equates coal burning with wave energy and whatever you mean by “biomass burning,” which doesn’t sound very sustainable.
—Reorganize your material to promote the primacy of the spanking new innovation: wave energy, and give us a hint what it might be.
—If your first paragraph does its job, this one should help unfamiliar readers understand how the heck the regular motion of waves can become electricity. “State-of-the-art technology” doesn’t explain anything.
—Don’t waste this opportunity to champion something quite magical, inexhaustible, utterly clean, totally free, and non-polluting.
—You’re the expert here, having done the research. So, share.
—I’m getting really nervous here that you’re going to end up spending 1000 words to provide a generic “survey of energy production techniques” that simply delays whatever wonderful, specific, and with luck counterintuitive proposal you’re going to surprise us with. I hope we’ll get there in the next paragraph.
—Nope. Still treading water. And misrepresenting “co-firing” as sustainable.
—Is it better than burning coal alone? Sure.
—If I told you I had figured out how to save the planet by mixing 10% cooking oil with 90% gasoline to power my car by “cofiring” the fuel in my fleet of several million cars, would that make your list?
—No doubt new energy streams generate investment, employment, and innovation, but . . .
—So do efforts to drill even deeper into the earth even farther off-shore or further into the Arctic ice fields.
—It’s a useful Rebuttal argument for an opponent of your plan from someone who objects that it might put some coal miners out of business, but as a positive argument for halfway solutions, it isn’t very persuasive.
—See above.
—This is disappointing, Snowman.
—You’ve impressed me every class day by producing incredibly smart, beautifully phrased, utterly relevant summaries of our class proceedings in your daily Agenda Notes.
—Here, you’re phrasing things well, but you’re not making an argument that needs making.
—Until you replace your Hypothesis/Proposal with a much better one, I’m going to hold you to the original plan.
—Concentrate on the exponential growth of solar panel efficiency and the prospect that, by 2030, cars could power themselves by collecting solar energy using their own dedicated panels, or perhaps even collecting the sun’s rays with their “paint jobs” and converting it to motion.
This does not in any way change the “contract” I have with all students that encourages you to “follow the research” and adapt your thesis to the surprising finds you encounter. But the other half of that contract, that you’re stuck with your Hypothesis until you replace it with a demonstrably better one. applies here, too.
Provisionally graded at Canvas. It’s not the grade you want, but it’s the first step in the process. This is a rewriting course. Your grade is always in flux.
I’ve spent about an hour on your essay now, Snowman. I hope it was helpful and that you can apply the advice and modeling to the rest of your work. If I didn’t get to something specific you’d like me to consider, please ask. But . . .
. . . by the terms of our contract, you now owe me at least an hour of revisions to your essay to earn a Regrade and any additional feedback.
Don’t forget. MAKE NO CHANGES TO THIS POST. Copy and paste it into your Def/Cat Rewrite. Make your revisions there. You’ll need evidence of where you started so you can brag about how far you went to get to your final draft. We can do this. I will gladly Conference with you at any time.
LikeLike