White Paper-Sallcomp2

Leading Apple With Steve Jobs: Management Lessons from a Controversial Genius

Content Description

  • Apple compared to other brands
  • Consumers relation with the technology: Steve’s mission is to make technology friendly and appealing to humans
  • Apple foundation:
  • What statement is apple based on: The two statements Apple premises were based on are: Achieve our goals is important to us; We are equally concerned the way we reach these goals.
  • Steve Jobs view in design: Design is not only how it looks but also how it works. Steve loved well designed cars. He even talked to Giorgetto Giugiaro (designer of Maseratti) about designs for Apple
  • Steve jobs organized his team as pirates: Steve’s magic was to work with people of Apple to create more artful products. Great product design would be key to get Apple selling again
  1. Working Hypothesis 1

If Apple didn’t have that elegance to the design of their products, it would’ve had the same attention that every other major tech companies have.

  1. Working Hypothesis 2

Despite the mass Apple loyal consumers, its products quality has a small impact on its success. Apple products are not technologically superior to every technology brand in the market right now.

  1. Topics For Smaller Paper

What does this mean for Apple in the future

This means that in the future, Apple inc. will have a big challenge in keeping their position on top. Technologically, big names like Samsung and Microsoft are already catching up on Apple in the market and Samsung is an even bigger company than Apple. Apple inc. only beats those companies because of their understanding of the modern adopted design. But if there’s anything that time taught us is that fashion is an art that changes momentarily. It’s an art that keeps evolving from the most daring abstracts, it’s not fashion if nobody tells you the piece is not ordinary. But with this generation growing, it won’t be very hard for other companies to find those kids that think totally out of the box, Apple called them “Pirates”

Is It Possible for Apple inc. to Dominate the Future Market?

Yes it could be a big possibility although it won’t be easy. As of now Apple being the company with user friendliest devices, might have a big competition with Google Glasses. Whom by name is obviously in direct skin contact with its users, so Apple had to come up with a wearable device too, and its called Apple Watch. Apple inc have been keeping up with the consumers trends, this is the reason of their strong consumer loyalty. With such consumer loyalty, A product development or market penetration won’t be difficult.

 

  1. Current State Of Research Paper

I’m still developing the research paper, but at this point I have some ideas that could work great with the paper and others I need to work in order to make them flow with the hypothesis.

This entry was posted in X Archive. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to White Paper-Sallcomp2

  1. sallcomp2's avatar sallcomp2 says:

    feedback requested.

    Feedback provided. —DSH

    Like

  2. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    Hey, Sall. Welcome back from spring break.
    The first thing I notice about your White Paper is that the content description doesn’t seem to support your hypotheses very well.

    Among other things, your Content section promises that you’ll make claims about
    —making technology friendly
    —using design to accomplish functionality
    —achieving goals responsibly
    —acting as pirates

    Your hypothesis that elegance, not functionality, is the primary appeal of Apple products seems to contradict the company’s goal of producing functional products.

    Your two other content claims, that the company is responsible and that its employees act like pirates, also seem contradictory.

    Microsoft has always been the biggest software company, so I don’t think it has to catch up with Apple for size. Microsoft doesn’t sell hardware, so maybe that’s what you mean, since you’re comparing Samsung, a producer of phones. Microsoft has both software and hardware competitors, of course, so you should be clear about that. Android as a platform, Google as a monster in search, communications, and internet services, is a different kind of competitor. Arguing about Apple’s functionality and design is complex because the company makes things plus operating systems and provides services to customers.

    You’ll need to focus your attention carefully. Your emphasis seems to be on the design of physical devices, so try to stay there. (But you can’t ignore that those devices depend in large part on their software for their functionality.)

    Helpful? Any thoughts of your own? I await your reply.

    Like

    • sallcomp2's avatar sallcomp2 says:

      Yes it is very helpful, but when I compared Samsung and Apple, it was based on cell phone manufacturing which Apple is now leading the market not size. You’re also right about my hard time on focusing on just the design. I want to talk about although Apple have good designs, they are technologically superior to Samsung.

      Like

Leave a reply to sallcomp2 Cancel reply