Visual Rewrite- taddo

  • I used the ad ‘Drunk Driving Prevention- Skeletons’. This ad had portrayed 4 young people, two males and two females, getting ready to leave the bar for the night.
  • It shows them all around the car and some getting into the car in the beginning. The blonde talks to the boy with the glasses outside the car. She seems distraught, probably about getting into the car. The boy with the glasses seems to laugh off whatever she is saying and kisses her and nudges her to continue to get into the car.
  • The other boy approaches the car somewhat stumbling and also holding a beer in his hand, one that he probably did not even get to finish yet.
  • He gets into the car and hands the girl in the front seat his open beer, while she continues to hold her own.
  • The boy with the glasses in the backseat also has an open beer in his hand.
  • This is interesting because not only is he getting into his car while clearly under the influence of alcohol, he is allowing open containers to be in his moving vehicle.
  • The only one without a beer is the blonde girl in the backseat.
  • The boy in the backseat says something to the driver, placing his hand on his shoulder. The driver answers him and somewhat shrugs off whatever was said to him. The boy with the glasses seems satisfied with his response and kicks back and puts his arm around the blonde.
  • The driver had clearly been drinking, as had the others in the car as well. They all got in the car with him and they allowed him to drive while under the influence.
  • It is easy to blame the driver because they got behind the wheel and knew they were drinking, but everyone knows your thought process gets impaired when drinking alcohol.
  • If you let your friend drive drunk, it is easy to feel like you are to blame because you never should have let them drive in the first place.
  • Situations are always different, but if you know a friend had been drinking a lot throughout the night and you can see that their driving skills are going to be impaired, there is no reason you should allow them to willingly get behind the will for any reason, especially if you are a passenger in the car.
  • They all got in the car and not one of them put their seat belts on.
  • The end shows the driver putting the key into the ignition and struggling a little to get it in there, the second he gets it in and turns the key, its a flash and all the people in the car turn to skeletons.
  • This portrays a strong message that the second you get into the car drunk or with a drunk driver, you are as good as dead.
  • We learn that even if people same hesitant, as the blonde did about getting into the car, that it is easy to be pressured to do something you know is not right or could be dangerous. We also learn that no matter what, even if the driver convinces you they are okay to drive, there is no reason to let a friend drive drunk like that. It is never a good idea to get into the car with someone who is so intoxicated they can’t even find where to put the key in the ignition. Like I said, when you willingly get into the car with a drunk driver, even if you are drunk yourself, you are as good as dead; and that is what the skeletons are trying to represent at the end when the people are replaced by skeletons as the driver starts the car.
Posted in X Archive | 3 Comments

Visual Rewrite – juggler

Public Service Announcement –  Body Language – Wedding

  • The ad begins with a young white bride wearing a beautiful white lace dress, she is rubbing her hands together in a stiff nervous manner.  A white lace curtain hangs in the background as if she  is waiting inside a house or church.
  • Bridesmaids are sitting in a row each holding identical bouquets of beautiful colorful flowers waiting for the wedding to commence.
  • The groom is dressed in a suit he loosens his shirt around his neck,  he looks uncomfortable or he may even be hot or nervous.  The sun is shining with beautiful foliage in the background.
  • Two women took a deep breath, gasping for air as if they were overwhelmed with what they are watching.
  • The camera zoomed in on an older woman with salt and pepper hair focusing on her eyes filling up with water as she smiles with joy.
  • The bride is standing in front of her guest, she is wearing red lipstick and one string of pearls, her chest expands in and out as if she is taking a  deep breath.
  • The priest puts his hands together locking his fingers.
  • An older white woman with deep wrinkles in her face holds her hands under her chin with a big smile as if she just witnessed something beautiful.
  • The bride leans in with a big smile on her face as she kisses her new husband.
  • A white woman holding  a camera raises her hand for the bridal party to jump for a  picture.
  • An Asian man dressed in a suit with a white rose pinned to his lapel taps the microphone with a smile waving his arms as if he is requesting silence so he can speak.
  • He said something funny, a young white lady is rolling her eyes as  the camera pans over and shows another woman covering her mouth with her right hand as she shrugs her shoulders.
  • A young lady with dark skin raises her hand to cover her mouth so no one can see what she is saying and whispers into what appears to be her mother’s ear.   The women are showing an expression of being surprised or even disgusted.
  • A man with earphones who appears to be rallying the crowd by waiving his hands in the air, bouncing up and down as he dances to the music.  The white lights show that it is dark outside.
  • An older white woman dressed in a green dress with sequins is dancing giving the thumbs up as if she liked what was going on or she just may have a nervous twitch.
  • The guest and the bridal party are raising their glasses of champagne laughing, smiling and just having a great time.
  • A man dressed in a suit with his back facing the camera holding a piece of strawberry short-cake, or wedding cake on a small plate drops his plate as if he lost his balance or someone bumped into him.
  • A white woman with medium length blonde appears sad and the right side of her face is drooping.
  • A white middle-aged man with a belly in a black shirt and light-colored pants with a goatee lifts his left arm. A side profile of a white woman says something and the words “Speech Difficulty” appear on the screen together.
  • Picture of a phone appears demonstrating how to dial 911.
  • Learn the body language and spot a stroke fast.

Learn sudden signs and spot a Stroke FAST

F-Face Drooping, A-Arm Weakness, S-Speech Difficulty and
T-Time to call 911

It’s counterintuitive to think that an ad with a happy bride, dancing, champagne toast, and tears of joy can send a message about having a “Stroke,” right?   Well, the creator of this ad was clever and was able to draw the viewer in and focus on a joyful occasion.  Even though the ad didn’t have much dialogue, the soft music pulled you in and allowed the viewer to focus on the actors facial expressions and body language.

Body language is an amazing instrument that all humans share and it’s clear to see that having a “stoke” or being “happy” are two completely non-verbal messages.

Published on Nov 27, 2012

URL-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssdAuj5HQKM

Posted in Assignments | 6 Comments

Visual Rewrite–mopar

Drunk Driving Prevention – Skeletons

The video starts off with a group of friends in a parking lot of what could be a bar. A young couple are about to get in the backseat of a car as they are waiting for their other friends to come out of the bar. The girlfriend has a worried looked on her face continues to shake her head ‘no’ when it looks like the boyfriend is trying to talk her into getting into the car.  The boyfriend has a sympathetic look on his face like he is trying to convince the girlfriend of something. He then kisses her and the girlfriend smiles and gets into the car. As she does one of their friends gets into the car holding a beer. The friend gets into the passenger seat and talks to the girlfriend in the backseat with a smile like they are joking around.

As everyone gets into the car the last friend, the driver of the car, comes staggering out of the building they are parked in front of holding a beer. The driver jokes with the girl in the backseat’s boyfriend as they get into the car. It’s clear that the driver has had one too many beers and shouldn’t be driving. He’s not walking straight and is slurring his words a little. As he gets into the drivers seat he hands his beer to the girl in the passenger seat rather violently. He probably didn’t mean to do it as hard as he did but obviously he is intoxicated and isn’t in full control of his actions. The only one in the car that asks if he is okay to drive is the boyfriend in the backseat. The boyfriend leans forward and says something to the driver. The driver looks like he’s struggling to answer the question but finally gets out the words: “I’m fine, what’s a couple of beers?” As he says this his head tilts to the side and he looks pale in the face. He then attempts to get the key into the ignition to start the car. On the second or third attempt he finally gets it in and they drive off.

There is a cut scene and all of the bodies get switched with skeletons and the narrator say “If you don’t stop your friend from drinking and driving, your as good as dead.” The switch from the actually humans to skeletons in the car shows how dangerous and what could happen if someone drinks and drives. At the end of the video there is a human hand reaching out and shaking a skeleton hand and the words “Drinking and driving can kill a friendship.”

Posted in Author | 1 Comment

Visual Rewrite–qdoba

“Women’s Heart Disease”

Women’s Heart Disease

The message of this short video delivers has an amazing impact on many.  We see a woman of color standing before a clothesline from the ceiling, in an old-fashioned kitchen suggesting a time women had unequal rights to men and were inferior. The clothes hanging up from the ceiling portrays her role as the typical housewife who tidies up the house and keeps it in good shape; her hair is pinned up in the back and her dress drapes down to the floor representing the colonial times, which forced women how to present themselves. In just a few seconds, we are reminded how the typical household looked in America before women had equal rights.  While the woman stays home and cleans, the man is off at work to pay the mortgage.

Delving into the next scene, the woman is elevated through the ceiling from a textile room, raising her to a completely different area where she is mounted behind a podium.  She is rising above the old-fashioned reputation and the lifestyle of how women were portrayed.  In the room, the video shows a crowd of women of different races empowering one another, showing that no matter what kind of woman they are, they all have something in common. No matter their race, religion, or ethnicity, they are strong and independent women who cannot be oppressed and neglected of their freedom and rights.  The several “WOMEN UNITED” posters hanging around the tightly compacted room show independence from society’s standpoints. Now, wearing a bandana in her free hair, along with a pair of pants and hoop earrings show a standpoint of a change in our society.

Continuing to the last few seconds of the clip shows yet another depiction of women empowerment. The woman is elevated to a higher level in the social status and the business world. Standing in a high-class office while wearing a suit, much like a mans suit, showing the woman having power, status, and importance as if it were a job meant for a male. Her hair is loosely curled with nothing holding it back, not hair tie, no pin up, or a bandana. The hair represents accomplishment and strength. Towards the end of the scene, she says, “Today women can do anything men can do.  And there’s one thing we’re even better at.”  America has changed the way they see in women and how they are treated.  Women strive for equal rights in our history and have become quite successful.  When she is lying on the floor it is because of heart disease and how women are “better at” getting heart attacks due to the disease.  This illness does not just occur in men, but in women as well, showing that everyone is human no matter what gender.  Anyone can strive for the same opportunities, the same goals, and unfortunately catch the worst diseases.

Posted in X Archive | 5 Comments

Visual Rewrite–Thegreatestpenn

Youth Reckless Driving

The scene opens up with a shot of a red sedan looking head on through the windshield.  A young gentleman is getting into the car with three others already inside.  He’s wearing a red sports jersey underneath his large blue jacket with white trim and a large yellow football stitched into the right side.  Clearly he is interested in sports or his school teams.

Upon entering the vehicle he greets the passenger in the back first, closes the door as the car pulls away from the curb, he puts on his seat belt and greets the other passengers in the car with slightly less enthusiasm.  Maybe he doesn’t know the gentlemen in the front as well as the one in the back.

The newcomer talks to the driver for a few seconds, and the camera angle changes to the face of the driver where he looks indifferent to what he said.  Switching to the newcomer’s face he seems surprised and then amused at the driver’s response.  In the background you can see a stop sign go by on the left side of the car, however the car never stops or even appears to slow down.

Seemingly in response to the driver’s response, the newcomer pulls out a camcorder and points it at the driver, seemingly from nowhere.  The driver immediately gets uncomfortable and says something to the newcomer and his look changes to one of annoyance.  The passenger in the back does not share the drivers feelings of annoyance when the camcorder is pointed at him.  He looks excited and even holds up a peace sign to the camcorder.  The camera angle then zooms in on that passengers face where his expression changes from happiness and excitement, to sadness and he looks down.  The only person that was talking was the newcomer so he must have said something that was upsetting or something that made him ashamed.

The camera angle changes one last time to a fixed shot from the rear of the car as it drives away.  The car is in the middle of the road driving in what seems like a development from the trees and houses on either side of the small road.  Words appear in the top left of the screen saying: “If your friend is driving recklessly, Say Something.”

Now that the position of the video is clear, the newcomer’s position in the video becomes clearer.  He is an older person who was indicating that the driver was driving recklessly and judging by his surprised expression from the drivers response, the driver didn’t care.  When he pulled the camera and began filming the other rear passenger, the passenger eventually got a sad and almost embarrassed look on his face.  The newcomer brought up the reckless driving done by the driver and showed that the passenger in the back didn’t do anything, didn’t have the guts or courage to address the danger that the driver was putting them in.

Posted in X Archive | 4 Comments

Moving Visual Rewrite- YouDontKnowWhoIAm

Keeping Kids In School PSA

MUTE PLAY THROUGH

The video’s first five seconds bring us to a classroom, where the teacher is standing infront of the class with a clip board, most likely taking attendance before class starts. The classroom is decorated for fall, with brown and yellow leaf garland draped over the whiteboard.  She appears to be calling a students name, then glances up at the class with a blank expression, kind of like she is waiting for a response from the child who’s name she just called. The child is probably not in class, and doing something else.  The video then chances scenes to a bedroom, where a child is sleeping in bed. The room is well lit, and sunlight is coming through the windows. This means it is daytime, and while the kid should be in school learning, he is laying in bed. The child says something I cannot recognize, then continues laying motionless in his bed. It seems as though it is not a weekend because of the prior scene of the children in class. This child appears to be skipping class, either his mother didn’t wake him up, or his parents don’t care about his attendance to school.

The videos next five seconds bring us back to the classroom scene,this time  the classroom is decorated for the Holidays, with white garland and snowflakes hanging up above the white board. The teacher is sitting on her desk in the front of the room with her clip board, and calls a name again. Most likely calling the same child’s name. Looking up at the class for a response, but still not getting one. The video again changes scenes back to the same child in the bed from the first scene. This time he appears to be at home, or at a family members house holding a baby. In the background is an adult woman, perhaps his mother, leaving the house as the child is left home with the child. Maybe his mother couldn’t find a babysitter for the infant child and figured it’d be easier and cheaper to leave the kid home with her son. But her son, however, is missing out on early education that is crucial for success.

Next, the video takes us to another classroom scene with the classroom decorated for spring this time, with sunshine and a butterfly on the white board. Words on the board read “Spring and Sprung”. The teacher again is taking attendance, and calls a students name, but again the student is not in class. The same child each time is not in class. This time the student is at an amusement park with his friend riding a roller coaster instead of being in class. Showing that his priorities lie in having a good time, not being successful in school.

The next and final scene of the video before the tagline comes up shows a scene of a highschool graduation. The man at the podium, I’m guessing from watching the prior scenes, is calling that same kids name, but again, he is not there. The man is most likely a principal, superintendent, or vice principal.  The camera moves to show all of the students with their graduation caps on, with one empty seat in the front row, probably belonging to the kid from all of the prior scenes. All of the students who are graduating are looking around, trying to figure out where that student is. He obviously isnt there because he either didn’t make the grades to graduate with his class, or his past habits stuck, and he thinks graduation is not a big accomplishment. The information screen comes up with a website, boostattendance.org.

PLAY THROUGH WITH SOUND

“Michael Adams?” the teacher says while taking attendance. Michael Adams is the child that is not in class each time. The next scene brings us to his bedroom where he is laying there silently before muttering the word “here”, obviously a message to us that he is in bed sleeping, while he should be in school learning. The next scene brings us to the classroom where the teacher calls his name again “Michael Adams?” Again Michael isn’t in class, he is at home rocking a baby in his arms as his mother leaves. He says “Here” again, this time he says it with a disappointed tone of voice. As in he’d rather be anywhere but the place he’s in right now. The next scene comes back to the classroom where the teacher is taking attendance again, “Michael Adams?” she says for a third time. Michael isn’t there again. This time Michael is with his friend at an amusement park riding a roller coaster. This time he says with excitement “HEEEEEEREEE!” as he raises his arms above his head on the coaster. The final scene brings us to graduation day, where the principal of the school calls Michael’s name, and looks at the group of students. Michael again isn’t here. One student in the front row looks over at his empty seat before the scene ends. The narrarator then says “Students who miss 18 days of school in any grade risk falling behind and not graduating. Absences add up, keep track at boostattendance.org” then the video ends.

Posted in X Archive | 1 Comment

Visual Rewrite – CptPooStain

What it takes to be a Father

The PSA I chose to respond to is Fatherhood Involvement — Kid Again.

Although a short clip, 31 seconds to be exact, it speaks plenty and is able to strongly push a message across. The exact message the clip gives, although clear, can’t be fully determined until the latter end of the video.

The video starts out with a middle-aged looking man enjoying himself on a spring-rider presumably at a park. It quickly cuts to a woman on the other side of the now-confirmed park who pulls her baby-carriage in closer, as if she is uneasy with the man’s actions. The next scene is a man who smears his face into the glass of a corner-store, repeatedly making ridiculous faces and looking downwards across the corner. Then we see another man who observes this and exchanges a puzzled and judgmental glance. Finally we see a third middle-aged looking man in a shirt, tie, and khakis bouncing on something which is cut-out of sight by a fence.

We’ll refer to these men as man one, man two, and man three respectively. After the third scene cuts, it changes to a familiar setting, but with a girl laughing while looking through a glass. It then switches cameras to show man two making faces at the girl to entertain her. Subsequently, it cuts to man three, now we see he is jumping on a trampoline with a little boy. Lastly, the scene returns to the first setting with another young boy also enjoying himself on a spring rider right across from man one.

At this point, the message may still be unclear to some. However, shortly after the suspense is quenched, the scenes are played more in sequence as text appears on the screen. Text that says “fatherhood.gov”, and “877-4DAD411”. From this we can now conclude that each of the men were the fathers of the children in their respective scenes. The message, now even more clear, is a message geared towards fathers. It shows fathers acting childish with their children. Perhaps the PSA’s message is for fathers to remember to be kids again to be fully involved with their children. This presumption can be proved by reverting to the beginning of the video with audio. Towards the middle of the clip a voice comes in and says: “Sometimes all it takes to be a dad, is remembering how to be a kid again. Take time to be a dad today”.

Posted in X Archive | 3 Comments

Agenda MON FEB 09

Posted in Agendas, David Hodges, davidbdale, Professor Post | Leave a comment

A04: Visual Rhetoric Rewrite

Rewrite Assignment

Rewrites are always encouraged and necessary, but sometimes they’re also actually assigned and required. A04 is an assigned rewrite, with its own assignment number. You will create a new post for it in the A04: Visual Rewrite category.

Grade for this Assignment

Your grade for A02, if you already have one, will be expunged. You will receive a permanent grade for A04, which will fall into the Non-Portfolio category and never change. This is your one chance to improve that grade.

In the Portfolio

Of course, you will also enter a Visual Argument into your Portfolio at the end of the semester. At that time, you will have another opportunity to improve your work, presumably with skills you have acquired during the semester. While the final Visual Argument will not receive a separate grade of its own, it will contribute its wonderfulness to the rest of your Portfolio, which will receive one massive grade of real consequence.

The left-behind grade for A04, part of the smaller and less consequential Non-Portfolio grade, will nuance your end-of-semester course grade at best.

Rewrite Procedure

  • Ask for feedback if you want it and haven’t received it.
  • Feedback may be light since the deadline is short, but I will do my best to be responsive and helpful.
  • By all means read the comments I have left for your colleagues and of course review the Assignment itself for models and instructions you may have missed on the first draft.

ASSIGNMENT SPECIFICS

  • Above all, this is a VISUAL ANALYSIS assignment. If your readers cannot easily visualize the scenes you’re describing, revise your post until they can.
  • As before, you may structure your analysis any way you wish, provided it critiques the quality of the visual argument.
  • Include a Works Cited if you quote or cite sources.
  • Title your post Visual Rewrite—Username.
  • Publish your definition essay in the A04: Visual Rewrite category.

GRADE DETAILS

  • DEADLINE: Noon Wednesday (11:59 am WED FEB 11)
  • Customary late penalties. (Late less than 24 hours 10%) (24-48 hours 20%) (48+ hours, 0 grade)
  • Non-Portfolio Grade 
Posted in David Hodges, davidbdale, Professor Post | Leave a comment

A05: Research Proposal Plus 5 Sources

The Pitch

Our classroom discussions about prospective research projects have been, essentially, pitches. This assignment will be a more formal presentation of your pitch to research a particular hypothesis. If you make a strong enough case that I can feel confident you have a good plan to investigate a narrow, counterintuitive premise, I’ll be happy for you to develop and support a thesis with further research.

Specific. Arguable. Researchable. Verifiable.

The next stage of the process is to formalize your proposal in writing and produce the first five sources you’ve found of relevance to your hypothesis. I hope you’re choosing fields of study that interest you so that the next several weeks will be pleasurable and rewarding instead of drudgery. But beyond enjoyable, the hypothesis you propose must also be specific, arguable, researchable, verifiable.

You’ll be even more clear in your White Paper several weeks from now, but for SUN FEB 15, I’ll need just a proposal with sources. Following is an example from an earlier semester. Username explains the relevance of her first five sources to her nascent hypothesis.

Username‘s Proposal

For my research essay I will be examining America’s judicial flaw of false convictions. A study conducted by The University of Virginia in 2007 investigated the court cases of 200 death row inmates and found that a majority of them were innocent people being held in prison for a average of 12 years despite substantial evidence of their innocence that the court system failed to notice. As a nation that takes its law and justice system extremely seriously, America should not tolerate so catastrophic a failure. However, this problem is shockingly common and each year more than 10,000 innocent people go to prison for crimes that they did not commit.

While the most common reason for false convictions is eyewitness misidentification; another problem is the failure to consider DNA evidence that could potentially free the innocent person and place the guilty one behind bars. This problem is mind-blowing considering we live in a country that is so focused on justice and placing the guilty in prison. It is inexcusable how so many innocent people get sent to jail because prosecutors and crime scene investigators choose to dismiss extremely important evidence.

Is the Hypothesis Specific?

—AVOID: Naming a topic instead of a hypothesis.
“False convictions” is a topic, not a thesis.It would not be specific enough for a thesis.Username has avoided that pitfall.

—AVOID: Survey proposals.
“Suspects are falsely convicted for many different reasons” promises nothing but a survey of somewhat related material. It has no argument value and does not result in a proposal. Username has avoided that pitfall.

—CREATE: Controversial premise.
“False convictions are deliberate attempts to get convictions whether or not the suspect is guilty” is a valid, specific proposition that invites argument and that, if true, would demand a remedy. Username hasn’t specifically named this premise, but she could.

Is the Hypothesis Arguable?

—AVOID: Too Broad an argument.
“Many convicts are wrongfully incarcerated.” The premise can be interpreted to mean, among other things, 1) sentences are too long for misdemeanors, 2) laws are inconsistent across jurisdictions, 3) people who commit worse crimes are free, 4) youthful offenders should get probation, 5) thousands of defendants take “plea deals” for jail time to avoid more serious charges, or 6) poor defendants get weak legal defense. The argument is too broad to be meaningful.

—AVOID: Too Vague an argument.
“Convicts are jailed because of problems with evidence.” The premise might mean that police don’t gather enough evidence, that forensic technology is not sophisticated, that evidence can be corrupted or mishandled, that juries don’t know how to interpret evidence, that prosecutors suppress evidence, that evidence can be planted to frame suspects, that eyewitness evidence is unreliable, and on, and on.

—CREATE: A narrow framework for argument.
“Prosecutors unmask their true intentions when they attempt to suppress new exculpatory evidence.” This premise can certainly be argued. Username is already citing sources that identify death row inmates who have sought (and been denied) new trials when DNA evidence proves their innocence. The question: “Why would a prosecutor attempt to thwart justice by refusing to examine evidence that could free a wrongly convicted prisoner and put the real criminal in jail?” creates an opportunity for a narrow and controversial argument.

Is the Hypothesis Researchable?

—AVOID: Arguments about people’s feelings or beliefs.
That “prosecutors ignore new exculpatory evidence because they’re embarrassed to have convicted the wrong suspect” may very well be true, but it can’t be researched. Prosecutors are very unlikely to admit they made mistakes at all in gaining convictions. They’re much less likely to express embarrassment. Where would you look for the evidence?

—AVOID: Arguments that won’t be settled in your lifetime.
It would be pointless to argue that in fifty or sixty years every human will be DNA-coded at birth and that the failure to find a particular suspect’s DNA at the scene of a crime will automatically exonerate that suspect. No evidence of that future condition can be researched.

—CHOOSE: Researchable evidence.
On the other hand, you could argue that “since eye-witness testimony is proved unreliable by DNA evidence a staggering percentage of the time, no more suspects should ever be convicted of capital offenses without at least some physical evidence.” Numbers on faulty eye witnesses, wrongful convictions, and DNA reversals can all be researched.

Is the Hypothesis Verifiable?

—AVOID: Hypotheses with vague terms.
“Most of today’s death row inmates would be free if the court system was fairer.” The premise might be tempting for Username, but it’s too vague to verify. For example, a system that demanded stronger proof might exonerate a convict for his capital crime, but it might for different reasons have convicted him of related crimes committed at the same time or earlier. A “fairer” system might actually convict a larger, not a smaller, percentage of suspects.

—AVOID: Hypotheses with unverifiable conclusions.
Username might be tempted to claim that “Prosecutors and police do more harm than good by coercing eye witnesses to identify suspects.” When those witnesses err, and convictions result, the system may be to blame. But it’s also surely true that many witnesses who assist in rightful convictions would not have done so if not pressured to testify. The proportion of “coerced correct” to “coerced false” convictions is almost certainly unverifiable.

—CHOOSE: Hypotheses that can be quantified.
“Hundreds of death row inmates were convicted on the basis of eye witness testimony alone, evidence that has been clearly demonstrated to be too fallible for capital convictions,” for example.” If that proves to be true, it provides the factual basis for a strong thesis, that no suspect should be convicted of a capital crime on the basis of eye witness testimony alone, AND that anyone currently on death row for such convictions deserves a new trial when new physical evidence is available.

Username‘s Sources

1. “Wrongful Convictions: The American Experience

Background: This article discusses the depth of wrongful convictions in the United States as well as other nations such as Canada. It focuses on how wrongful convictions occur and organizations that are working to try and prevent them.

How I Intend to Use It: This article will help me discover the most common reasons why innocent people end up in prison. It lists at least seven possible reasons as to how wrongful convictions happen which will all help me eventually find ways to prevent this problem from occurring.

2. “Study Suspects Thousands of False Convictions

Background: This article from The New York Times focuses on a study conducted by The University of Michigan about 328 criminal cases in which the convicted person was released from prison. Upon finding this evidence, the University believed that thousands of innocent people are in prison for crimes they did not commit. While the article does not fixate on DNA exonerations, there is a large portion of it that suggests new DNA evidence can easily overturn wrongful convictions.

How I Intend to Use It: The information about DNA exonerations will be extremely useful to me as a major aspect of my argument will be DNA evidence that gets ignored. The study also highlights exactly how large of a problem false convictions are in the United States by using a small group of convicted inmates and discovering exactly how many of them are actually innocent, something I will be trying to prove in my essay on a larger scale.

3. 250 Exonerated, Too Many Wrongly Convicted

Background: This extraordinary document from “The Innocence Project”details the cases of 250 convicts falsely imprisoned, many for 20 years or more, on the basis of misidentification, false testimony, questionable evidence, or flawed test results. The Innocence Project is dedicated to helping free innocent victims that were falsely convicted. It uses DNA evidence to exclude convicts who have consistently and loudly protested their innocence of the crimes they’ve been convicted of.

How I Intend to Use It: I plan on using the information found in this document to provide concrete examples of people that were helped by the discovery or reopening of DNA or other evidence. This will further prove my point that so many innocent people go to prison for crimes they do not commit because law enforcement did not take the time to intensely go over every detail in a case.

4. “Prosecutors Block Access to DNA Testing for Inmates

Background: This article focuses on two men, one of which is in prison for a rape he insists he did not commit, and the other who says DNA evidence would prove he was falsely convicted of a double murder. The article states that prosecutors often resist reopening cases despite the fact that the reinstitution of a closed case could potentially free an innocent person from prison.

How I Intend to Use It: This article is entirely focused on the lengths that prosecutors go in order to step around the idea of reopening a case to do further DNA testing. Quite often, law enforcers are content with placing a person in prison and to them, a person in jail is a win whether they are innocent or not. This obviously is a major flaw in the justice system and I intend to expose this flaw with the help of this article as it offers a backstage pass into the world of criminology.

5. “Criminology” Beirne, Piers, and Messerschmidt, James. Criminology. Fort Worth, Texas. Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1991.

Background: This book provides background on all things related to Criminology. There is an entire chapter dedicated to false convictions that discusses all matters related to the problem.

How I Intend to Use It: This book will be very helpful to me when I am looking for background information and trying to become educated on the topic of criminology for the purposes of this essay. When I am looking for definitions and important things to know, I will reference this book.

Assignment Specifics

  1. Write a formal version of your research proposal, identifying what you expect to find, or hope to find, or are open to finding, in as much detail as you can manage.
  2. The proposal can be brief, provided it is clear. Your plan is preliminary and will not obligate you to remain faithful, but it should be offered in good faith. (It’s a proposal, not your wedding vows. You can change your mind without a lawyer.)
  3. Identify and link to your best 5 sources. Find academic sources if possible. If not, ask yourself: “Is the Hypothesis Researchable?”  As in the model assignment above, describe the value you believe the sources have in proving your hypothesis.
  4. Post your Research Proposal and Sources in the A05: Proposal+5 category.

Grade Details

DUE MIDNIGHT SUN FEB 15
Customary late penalties. (0-24 hours 10%) (24-48 hours 20%) (48+ hours, 0 grade)
Non-Portfolio grade category

Posted in David Hodges, davidbdale, Professor Post | Leave a comment