Bibliography – Moneytrees4

Bibliography

For my research assignment I will be examining if multivitamins are useful or not. Studies show that a third of American adults take a multivitamin on a daily basis. Separate studies in 2009 and 2011 also indicate that multivitamins have no positive effects on an individual’s health. With that said, we can see how people can end up wasting hundreds maybe even thousands of dollars a year.

But what could bring about such an oversight? Wouldn’t the companies that produce these products know that they are not effective if they are in fact useless?

The reason researchers and nutritionists are finding these multivitamins useless is because they say we get all of the nutrients and vitamins we need from the foods we eat. Granted these days there are much unhealthier, less fortified foods available, the foods we cook and eat at the dinner table provide all the nutrients we need according to researchers. Therefore, they feel that any extra from a supplement would result in an excess amount.

Vitamins: What to Take, What to Skip

Background: It is becoming more and more common knowledge that we get all of the vitamins and minerals we need from the foods we regularly eat. However, this article expresses that we should be getting them from the right foods. Leafy greens, fruits, and fortified foods are always good. There are a lot of foods that gives the minerals we need  but a lot of foods have extra chemicals and preservatives that are a detriment.

How I used it: This article will shed light on the difference between fortified foods and foods that don’t have much nutritional value. These days food is produced cheaper and faster meaning we eat a whole bunch of refined grains and processed foods. This document they say we get all we need from foods but which ones?

Experts: Don’t Waste Your Money on Multivitamins

Background: This article focuses on specific studies that indicate multivitamins do not boost a person’s well-being. However, vitamins and mineral supplements have been shown to reduce the risk of cancer. So this will also help me to examine the difference between these types supplements.

How I used it: To show that there is a difference between multivitamins, vitamins, and mineral supplements. Once I show the difference in these supplements I can explain why they work differently. Some are certainly more effective than others.

More evidence that routine multivitamin use should be avoided

Background: This article expresses how consumers of these supplements are being deceived. This leads to the population spending billions on useless products. Not only are they useless but that are actually known to cause damage.

How I used it: To show that the more we buy into these companies the larger they get. The prerogative of these companies is to make money so they are not concerned with the well-being of the population. Also to prove that if we have a nation that believes so strongly in something that is dangerous, what will the future of health look like.

Multivitamins – Benefits, Side Effects & The Best Multivitamin Brand

Background: This article provides general information on what a multivitamin is. This specific document however feels as though multivitamin use can be beneficial. This is the popular belief that they are good for mineral deficient diets. However recent studies show otherwise.

How I used it: To begin with knowledge on my topic. I will explain general functions of a multivitamin. What they are supposed to do and what they actually do. They certainly do not do what people would like to think.

Vitamins: The Good, the Bad, and the Useless

Background: This article focuses on what vitamins are in which foods. It consists of slides and each slide describes a different vitamin or mineral. This is helpful to allow us to switch up the foods we eat thus having a wider variety of nutrients.

How I used it: To prove that the good food choices provide all the nutrients we need. Expensive, futile pills are an unnecessary excess. This mean they can actually be detrimental to our health.

Vitamin Supplement: Healthy or Hoax?

Background: This article expresses the importance of good foods. However, the author feels as though only if there is a deficiency is a supplement of any kind needed.

How I used it: To show which vitamins if any are useful or needed.

Don’t Take your Vitamins

Background: As you can probably tell from the name, this article is against the use of vitamins. This can be any kind of supplement as well as a multivitamin.

How I used it: To show how a growing number of experts and consumers alike are realizing the short comings of multivitamins.

Multivitamins

Background: This article expresses that multivitamins are perfectly fine. This is a company that produces multivitamins so they will bring a different perspective.

How I used it: This piece will show that there are parties that believe multivitamins are useful. Or perhaps this is false information intentionally published.

Drugs.com/multivitamin

Background: It provides a definition and general facts about a multivitamin. This definition is biased toward neither side.

How I used it: To give general education to the reader on the topic of multivitamins. It would be  hard to understand the argument if it is unclear what a multivitamin is for.

Vitacost; Vitamins & Supplement Reviews

Background: This is a website that compares the best vitamins and their prices. The reviews come from consumers who have obviously used them and have positive or negative things to say about them in reviews.

How I used it: To give my paper a relatable edge to draw the readers in. This will make the information more concrete and reliable.

Why Multivitamins Might Do More Harm Than Good

Background: This article understands that multivitamins are essential. However they also express that there are negative effects or cons to them.

How I used it: To show that some people have different views even though multivitamins are useless. This can be and has been proven.

Vitamins

Background: The author of this article feels as though multivitamins are completely worth the money.

How I used it: To give general facts on the topic of multivitamins but also to show how people felt about these supplements before this recent research

Top Vitamins You Shouldn’t Take 

Background: This article shows that different types of vitamins can have many different functions.

How I used it: To explain that some multivitamins can be worse than others

Why you should not stop Taking your Vitamins

Background: The author of this piece seems to think that the scientist conducting this research are confused on its conclusions.

How I used it: As a different scientific point of view

Disease and Multivitamin

Background: This article expresses that multivitamins can have a special use

How I used it: To show what some supplements are “said” to help

Posted in X Archive | 2 Comments

Visual Rewrite- Hashmeesh

Buzzed Driving

The ad that I chose to analyze is called Buzzed Driving-Ambulance. This ad is used to help the prevention of buzzed or drunk driving. Drunk driving is a serious issue in today’s world. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYCHpZ13l-E

The ad opens up with two paramedics who are working franticly too keep what appears to be an unconscious man alive. As the two are working there is another man crying next to them. He seems to show sadness and you get a sense of grief or regret when he has his hands covering his mouth and when he brings them up to his head. He also has a laceration on his forehead as well. Every time he looks down at the unconscious  man he cries harder. The camera then gives us a view of the heart rate monitor, giving us a sign of hope and a little suspense. From what we can see the man is alive at the moment, but we can’t tell if he’ll live or die in the end. The man then says something to the paramedics that seems to strike a feeling of disbelief at first. The paramedics respond and then the man stops crying and his once dieing friend springs up and acts as if he wasn’t fighting for his life two seconds ago. The man is in aww and shows a sign of relief at the fact that his friend is now fine. The paramedics then say something to the man that brings everything back to reality. His friend falls back down on the stretcher and the paramedics continue to try and keep him alive. Now that his brief moment of happiness is gone he continues to cry. The ad ends with a text stating, “Buzzed Driving is Drunk Driving” just as the camera is focused on the crying friend. From the text at the end we can hypothesize that the man is crying because his friend is dying due to his “buzzed” driving.

Posted in X Archive | 2 Comments

visual rewrite-betterthanyou

Teen Suicide Prevention

The ad starts off by hitting a chord with most people by showing a student’s desk and the phrase “we’ve been labeled” which is referring to the countless bullies that have tormented innocent children whom have sat in that seat. It really resonates with anyone that has been put in such a situation. As the ad progresses it presented many different scenes where students would be, mainly in a school with different setting such as a classroom, hallway, bedroom, playground, and car. In each scene a different phrase is cleverly hidden on an object. This as has a strong appeal to pathos, with each scene using a different phrase as well as location to evoke empathy and compassion so the audience can remember the things they went through in the past and relate. It raises the question, is there something wrong with the way kids and teens are being treated and should there be something done to prevent this? The ad goes on, changing atmospheres over to more motivational phrases like “we’ve been found” and “we’ve been determined” telling us that no matter what has happened there is hope. Hope for a better and brighter future, free of the bad. Towards the end, they bring up multiple scenes with the phrase “we’ve been there”, which increases the ethos of the ad. With that phrase the audience can be confident the ad knows what it is talking about and the information it provides is truth-worthy because those that are helping have been through the exact same situations. In the end it lets the audience know how and where to receive help from others just like them. Overall this visual rhetoric really speaks volumes to a teen in need of help. It has a very somber tone throughout the video but lightens up and becomes a strong message at the end, “We can help us.” This video ad is directed towards those that need help and those that know someone in need of help to be able get the assistance that they need.

Link

Posted in Author | Leave a comment

Agenda WED FEB 11

  • Open My Notes
    • DON’T start a new post.
    • Update your My Notes post in Edit
    • Consider adopting a “Top Down” Chronology
  • Take credit for all your posts
    • Demo with hashmeesh
  • Cheers and Jeers (for Feedback?)
  • Lecture/Demo Visual Argument
    • Request Nominations on Paper
  • Model White Paper: Why We Still Have Polio
    • In-Class Exercise: Feedback on the Model
Posted in Agendas, David Hodges, davidbdale, Professor Post | 1 Comment

visual rewrite — CasperTheGhost

The Ad council has a series of PSAs that focus on pet adoption.  These PSAs all follow the same general theme.  They focus on a pet, usually a cat or dog, that have been recently adopted.  These PSAs start with a close up shot of the pet with a narrator voicing over the shot.  This gives the viewer that the voice is meant to be the pets voice, as if we are hearing what the animal is thinking. Then the camera shows the pets owner doing daily activities, and the pet watching the owner do these things.  For example, in one of the PSAs, it shows a cat sitting on a couch watching a little boy play in a sandbox.  The “voice” of the cat is saying that he is embarrassed that the little boy didn’t know how to “use” the sandbox.  From the cats point of view, the sandbox resembles a large, human-sized litter box, because it is the same general build as a litter box.  Both litter boxes and sandboxes are a big box filled with sand, so the joke of the PSA is that the cat thinks the boy is playing in a litter box.  When the cat sees the boy digging and jumping around in the sandbox, the cat thinks that the boy doesn’t know how to use a litter box, a skill that the cat says he was born with.

The PSA ends with the shot of the cat fading to a message written on the screen.  That message is“A person is the best thing to happen to a shelter pet”.

Posted in X Archive | Leave a comment

visual rewrite-brettbcomp2

On January 7, 2015, Al-Qaeda was held responsible for an attack on the office of a weekly french newspaper, Charlie Hebdo.  This attack was originated by Al-Qaeda due to the newpaper’s publication of a picture of Muhammad, which is not allowed in the Muslim religion.

The Charlie Brown graphic is depicted as having a very mournful expression, along with a very raggedy look which is shown by his over-worn shirt and messy shoe laces. Charlie’s face reflects grief over the massacred cartoonists.  The raggedy, broken look the character has may have been paired to this event to relate the effect the attack has had on Charlie Hebdo. This attack has hurt the company greatly putting them in a broken state.

The freedom of speech is viewed to be one of the most important rights a person has.  Charlie Hebdo had the right to publish the picture because of the freedom of speech.  Charlie Hebdo was punished by Al-Qaeda due to what they had published even though they had the right to publish it.  This in turn sparked controversy which exploded all over the media and had shown the world of this wrong-doing and tragedy.

Posted in X Archive | 1 Comment

Visual Rewrite–tagfcomp2

The Domestic Abuse Wedding Advetisment

• The “ad” begins with a wide camera shot of a loving couple in a church getting married, with family and friends supporting them. There are colorful flowers decorating the church’s benches, making the scenery romantic and inviting.

• Once the vows begin, the camera angle zooms up on the bride and groom’s faces as they look into each other’s eyes with passion. The couple maintains eye contact which symbolizes the deep connection the couple has made together over time.

• Next, the camera turns the opposite direction and focuses on the parents/grandparents of either the bride or the groom. The elderly couple is smiling, honored to partake in the ceremony combining two families. The parents/grandparents are proud of the couple in front of them.

• As the sacred vows continue, the couple continues the intimate eye contact. The groom gently strokes his bride’s hand to comfort her and show affection as she continues her vows.

• The wedding scene in the “ad” doesn’t seem anything out of the ordinary… if you’re viewing the “ad” silently. However, once the commercial is viewed with sound, the entire dynamic of the situation drastically changes. The commercial isn’t portraying a loving, healthy relationship. The bride begins the vows with “I vow to make excuses when you humiliate me in public”. This sets the unusual tone for the video, having the audience wonder “Why would the bride say something like that?” The audience is now informed that there’s a huge problem in the couple’s relationship.

  •  The bride continues her vows by saying “…forsake my friends and family when you isolate me, to devalue myself less when you belittle me. I vow to blame myself when you hit me and to fear for my safety and the safety of our children till death do us part”.
  • It’s counterintuitive to think of a wedding in a church, a sacred place, as a place to conduct a ceremony for an abusive relationship. Weddings that take place in churches are filled with affection and warmth, not anguish and distress, shown through the words of the woman’s wedding vows.
  •  I analyzed the video and concluded the bride’s vows in several different ways. The bride may have experienced abuse by her partner before and thought things would change for the better once they’re married. The bride may have also been thinking the words in her mind but the commercial told us her inner thoughts. The bride may actually love her partner but ignored the early warning signs of abuse and the vows foreshadow her depressing future.

• There are many ways to interrupt the Ad Council video on domestic violence. Regardless of which way you interrupt the domestic abuse scenario, there’s a powerful message at the end. It’s important to remember that things aren’t always as they seem. At the end of the commercial, the voiceover tells the audience not to ignore domestic abuse. The idea of “ignoring” the ‘red flags’ of domestic abuse fits symbolically with the video, considering the audience may have “ignored” the signs if they viewed the clip silently. The voiceover also says “speak now” referring to the audience speaking up about abuse at the end of the commercial. However, the video neglects to say “…or forever hold your peace,” which is an important part of wedding vows. The video is proving the point that a person in an abusive relationship doesn’t have to “forever hold their peace.” The message is to find help and end an abusive relationship, not to forever suffer through it.

  • The couple in the “ad” looked happy on the outside to all their friends and family, but the audience knows that’s not the truth once the vows are stated. The video also displays the idea that “things aren’t always as they seem” perfectly by having the couple look happy the entire time at the wedding. The audience wouldn’t of viewed the couple with suspicion of an abusive relationship if the sound wasn’t attached to the commercial.

Domestic Abuse Wedding Video

Posted in X Archive | 1 Comment

Visual Rhetoric- thatdude

I used a pet adoption ad which tried to raise awareness on adopting local animals from shelters. When I watched the video with no sound I saw pets that belonged to a shelter . I saw love and affection given form one pet to people who observed it at a shelter. I also saw interaction with the animals which made me realize how much I miss my dog at home. I then watched the video with volume and it showed me that these pets are no different from those  every one is accustomed to at a  normal pet store. It also tells of ways how shelters are going to start reaching out to people so that they can see the similarities between their own pets and these of a shelter.

Posted in X Archive | 1 Comment

A04: Visual Rewrite — skyblue

Fatherhood Involvement

  • The ad opens up and the viewer is immediately enticed by the hairy legs, that clearly belong to an older man, riding a tiny golden horse on a children’s playground. The camera then slowly moves up to the mans face and he is grinning from ear to ear going back and forth on the equipment while staring at a young mother and her baby in a stroller
  • You see the mother with a worried look on her face through the blurry yellow bars on the jungle gym as she pulls the baby’s stroller closer to her. Her facial expression shows that she is uneasy about the man on the playground and she thinks he is strange for acting like a child.
  • The ad then moves to a middle-aged man with a graying scruffy beard and a combed over graying hairstyle standing by what seems to be a window of a store.
  • He looks downward and presses his face up against the window making a pig nose and silly face. The man then quickly notices an African American man catching him and lowers his eyebrows as if to question his immature faces, the man quickly stops making the faces.
  • The ad then switches over to a man who looks to be about mid thirties jumping happily on a trampoline with a wooden fence blocking his lower half of his body. He waves across the wooden brown picket fence to his neighbor. The man continues to jump and twirl like a ballerina on the trampoline, seeming to enjoy himself greatly
  • The next scene the camera shows what the viewers were unable to see in the first half, it moves back to the man making the silly faces and sees a younger girl about five with brown hair and glasses giggling and making the funny faces back.
  • It then shows the man who was originally judging the other man making the faces give a look of approval and slight smile as he is just doing it to entertain a small child.
  • It then shows the man jumping on the trampoline but the camera now reveals the whole picture. Turns out the man is jumping around having a wonderful time with his young son.
  • Finally, it switches back to the man riding the golden horse on the playground and shows what he is really smiling at. There is a young boy, who could potentially be his son, riding on the other side who is bouncing up and down having the time of his life.
  • The ad is implying that fatherhood involvement is necessary for children growing up. Father’s act more of a kid themselves as opposed to mothers who are more nurturing, children need a balance of both in their lives.
  • When all the children appeared in the clip they were laughing and smiling and having a great time, which shows the viewer that father’s know how to joke around appropriately with their children.
Posted in X Archive | 2 Comments

White Paper: Polio

Why We Still Have Polio

Professor’s Foreword

Whenever possible, I will provide models of the type and quality of work I hope for from you. Today, I offer a draft of my own White Paper on the hypothesis that despite tremendous investment and will from hopeful eradicators, we may never be free of polio.

Work in Progress
Like all research documents, mine is a work in progress. It’s not intended to be a polished work product. I will solicit useful feedback from you, take that feedback into consideration, and use it to improve my White Paper throughout the semester, adding to it (or deleting sections I decide are irrelevant) as I modify my hypothesis in search of a thesis I can finally prove.

Readers Don’t Think. Writers Think.
The truth is, we don’t have a thought in our heads. We receive impressions, we experience sensations, our instincts control the momentary notions that flit across our consciousness: none of that adds up to actual ideas.

When we write, or speak, we are forced to organize the chaos in our heads to communicate the patterns of our impressions in a comprehensible fashion. In other words, we don’t have ideas until we write them.

The process contains an imaginary step.
It is useless, therefore, to separate the composition process into stages that don’t involve writing, such as:

  1. Collect sources
  2. Read sources
  3. Think about sources
  4. Organize our thoughts into patterns
  5. Write organized essay.

Thinking doesn’t occur during the reading process. There is no thinking until the writing begins. 3 by itself is a waste of time. 4 by itself is imaginary. The time to write about sources is while we’re reading them, bringing thinking into the reading process.

Writing is Thinking
The most effective technique, instead, and the one we’ll use in this class, is to write as a way of having ideas and clarifying our  arguments.

  1. Collect a Source
  2. Write about that Source
  3. Collect New Sources Suggested by a Developing Hypothesis
  4. Write about those Sources
  5. Repeat Beyond what is Needed
  6. Organize Research Writing into Persuasive Essay

Cutting, not Writing, is the Last Step
When we finish organizing, we’ll have too much material for a narrow thesis.The last step will be to eliminate non-essential material and edit our language for brevity and clarity, to prove one thing well instead of waving vaguely at everything.


Why We Will Always Have Polio

Children are the saddest casualties, and too often the most vulnerable. As recently as 2014, in the latest catastrophe to spin out of the death fest in Syria, the local polio outbreak spread to Iraq. Despite what the New York Times called “an ambitious Middle East inoculation effort,” the conditions of war, including tens of thousands of internal refugees huddled in unclean camps, once again catapulted the insidious virus across international borders to threaten mostly the vulnerable children, this time in Iraq.

Always opportunistic, the virus that causes polio thrives during conflict and mayhem. Repeatedly over the last half century, whenever mankind has come close to banishing the disease forever, human misadventures have invited it back. Certainly in times of war, but even during peace, we have failed to accomplish the ultimate eradication we seek. The world is not as ripe for cooperation now as it was in 1977, when humanity accomplished the eradication of smallpox once and forever, and that dreaded disease released its hold on our fears.

230px-Child_with_Smallpox_Bangladesh

Smallpox victim, Bangladesh

An editorial in the journal Lancet, September 2006, relates the sad history of polio vaccination campaigns stymied by distrust in the very communities they are meant to protect. Incorrect but not entirely groundless fears that mass vaccination is a conspiracy by the developing world against poor countries have for years complicated the efforts of volunteers to conduct the one-day mass immunization efforts that have been the most effective part of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) plan for decades. Even when funding, volunteers, and sufficient doses have been present, the trust of the poor and often suspicious residents of vulnerable countries has been absent.

But the developing world has no monopoly on ignorance, wilfulness, and distrust. [Just this month, Time magazine, using data provided by the New York Times, reports that “measles has made a comeback, at least in New York City, where as many as 19 cases have been confirmed.”] Update with more current source for 2015 Disneyland outbreak.

The small number of cases, for measles or for polio, is never a reason for complacency. For decades, childhood measles cases in the US, a triumphant result of universal vaccination, numbered zero. Said Time in 2014: “The emergence of these diseases—especially measles—is alarming, and mostly due to parents in the U.S. not vaccinating their kids.”

2014 Syrian Outbreak

The transmission of polio, a highly contagious disease that primarily afflicts children younger than 5 and can lead to partial and sometimes fatal paralysis, reflects one of the most insidious effects of the three-year-old Syria conflict, which has sent millions of refugees across the country’s borders and severely undermined its public health system.

For Iraq, the outbreak is the first time in 14 years that polio has appeared; the disease was absent even during the 2003-2011 war that began with the American-led invasion to topple Saddam Hussein.

World Health Organization officials said the first Iraqi polio case, that of a 6-month-old boy in Baghdad, was confirmed on March 30 by Iraq’s Ministry of Health and had the same genetic fingerprint as the virus that paralyzed 27 children in eastern Syria in October — both having originated in Pakistan, one of the few countries in the world where polio has not been eradicated. The Polio Global Eradication Initiative, a partnership that includes the W.H.O., reported two new Syria cases last week — in Aleppo and Hama, far from the original outbreak area.

Christopher Maher, the eastern Mediterranean manager of the W.H.O.’s Polio Eradication and Emergency Support unit, said that Iraqi officials had been immunizing children protectively since the Syria outbreak began, and that in light of the first confirmed case in their home country they were now expediting another scheduled round of vaccinations.

“At the moment, they’re madly preparing their response plan,” Mr. Maher said in a telephone interview. It takes multiple rounds of vaccine, taken orally, to immunize a child.

Iraq has an estimated five million children under the age of 5. While estimates vary on the number of infections for every confirmed case, and not all children develop symptoms, Mr. Maher said, “in all likelihood it would be dozens — you’ve got to assume there’s some extension of the transmission.”

The W.H.O. and UNICEF said in a joint statement on Sunday that Iraq’s expedited polio response was part of a broader vaccination effort in the region, with the goal of reaching more than 20 million children this week. Lebanon and Turkey will participate later this month, and Jordan and the Palestinian territories will be part of future vaccination rounds, said Juliette S. Touma, a spokeswoman for UNICEF’s regional office in Amman, Jordan.

“The recent detection of a polio case in Iraq after a 14-year absence is a reminder of the risk currently facing children throughout the region,” Maria Calivis, the UNICEF regional director for the Middle East and North Africa, said in the statement. “It is now even more imperative to boost routine immunizations to reach every child multiple times and do whatever we can to vaccinate children we could not reach in previous rounds.”

The statement acknowledged that the effort had “yet to reach especially vulnerable groups such as children who are on the move fleeing violence from Syria or those living in the midst of active conflict.”

Some rights advocates and public health experts have criticized the W.H.O. and other United Nations agencies for adopting an accommodating policy toward President Bashar al-Assad of Syria, who they contend has deliberately withheld inoculations against polio and other contagious diseases to insurgent-controlled areas.

Dr. Annie Sparrow, a pediatrician and deputy director of human rights at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York, said in a study published in February that the polio outbreak in Syria was far more widespread than just the cases reported by the W.H.O. The health organization has disputed her findings.

Dr. Sparrow said in a telephone interview on Monday that the most recent polio news from Iraq and Syria was both expected and alarming. “It should signal an absolute failure of the global eradication effort,” she said.

Mr. Assad’s forces, she said, “have been bombing the heck out of the people of Aleppo instead of vaccinating them, which is what they should be doing.”

While Mr. Maher said the spread to Iraq was not in itself surprising, health officials were uncertain about its precise path to Baghdad, where the victim had no obvious contact with possible carriers from Syria, most of them refugees concentrated near Iraq’s border with Syria.

“It’s great if you have clear-cut chain of transmission so you can easily see how this would happen — maybe a refugee child,” he said. “But where you would expect to see the virus would have been in the northwest, and not down in Baghdad.”

At the same time, he said, the confirmed case reflected the ability of the polio virus to find vulnerable victims, touching a child who had been part of “a pocket of under-immunized children in the community.”

Ms. Touma said the inoculation effort in Syria had made progress but was still failing to regularly reach an estimated 323,000 Syrian children at the highest risk of contracting polio, in areas of fighting or restricted access.

“The trick with polio is that we can’t give up, we have to do multiple inoculations continuously and as wide as possible,” she said.

 

Resurgent Measles Threat

“Twenty-five years ago, the vast majority of measles cases were among elementary schoolchildren who caught it from their classmates, but that group now accounts for less than 10 percent of cases. Schools now require measles vaccine for enrollment.”

“Also, the disease is now attacking population groups that have not been vaccinated, perhaps through parental ignorance or neglect, or been exposed to the disease because of their age. Historically, deaths rates have always been high in such groups. Before the advent of a measles vaccine in 1963, virtually everyone could count on frequent exposure.”

“There were nearly half a million cases of measles nationally each year in the early 1960’s. The number of cases dropped to a low of around 2,000 in 1983, two decades after the development of a vaccine. But the disease began a dramatic comeback in 1989, and 1991 promises to be a bad year, particularly in the Northeast. New York City reported more cases in the first 12 weeks of 1991 than in all of 1990.”

Thanks to Anti-Vaxxers

Measles has made a comeback, at least in New York City, where as many as 19 cases have been confirmed.

New York City isn’t an anomaly, though. Diseases that are and have been avoidable in the U.S. thanks to vaccines, are resurfacing all across the country. Measles, for instance, was considered wiped out in 2000, but there have been several outbreaks in the past few years.

Though measles outbreaks are primarily linked to unvaccinated people, McDonald notes that some vaccines aren’t foolproof. For example, the whooping-cough vaccine may lose its efficacy over time. And, overall, most people do get their vaccinations. A CDC report looking at children entering kindergarten for the 2012–13 school year in all U.S. states found that more than 90% of these kids had their vaccines.

Still, there are people — including public figures and celebrities — who don’t vaccinate their kids and promote their choices. Most infamously, Jenny McCarthy has espoused her anti-vaccination position because she believes vaccines are full of toxins and cause autism. When she recently posed a question on Twitter about finding a mate, the vaccination backlash was loud and clear.

Just how harmful are these notions, though? Below are some preventable diseases making a vicious return thanks to people not getting their vaccinations.

Dangers of Measles

According to the CDC, for every 1,000 children who get the measles, one or two will die. Currently, public-health workers are worried about the situation in New York, but just in the past three months, there have been reported cases of the disease in Massachusetts, Illinois and California. The CDC reports that from Jan. 1 to Feb. 28, 2014, 54 people in the U.S. have reported being infected with measles. On average, there are about 60 cases reported in the U.S. every year. Most people in the U.S. are vaccinated against the measles, but since measles is still around in other countries, those who travel outside of the U.S. can contract it if they are not vaccinated. New York City has not been able to confirm the source of the disease.

How and Why of Polio

Polio (short for poliomyelitis) is an infectious disease that rarely kills but cripples about 1 in 200 of its victims. The virus invades the nervous system and can lead to irreversible paralysis in just hours. Adults fight off the infection more effectively than children, most often children younger than five. There is no cure, but there have been safe and effective vaccines for more than 50 years. By their nature, vaccines need only be administered once to be effective for a lifetime, so the strategy to eliminate polio once and for all from the planet is to vaccinate every child until transmission stops. If the world can be made polio-free for a moment, it will remain polio-free forever.

The virus enters the body through the mouth, multiplies in the intestine, and is passed to others through the feces; therefore, it ravages particularly countries with poor sanitation and hygiene. Children not well toilet-trained are a danger, but even flies can passively pass the virus from feces to food. A single case of polio, if it fails to migrate to other vulnerable children, can die out in that community forever. Complicating matters, most infected individuals show no symptoms and can silently pass the virus on unwittingly until it dies out in their bodies naturally. Therefore, a single reported case is usually taken as evidence of an epidemic.

Effectiveness of Vaccination

A simple, inexpensive, oral vaccination developed in 1961, administerable by non-physician volunteers, is the primary method of preventing polio among children. The vaccination produces antibodies in the blood to all three types of polio virus which prevent the virus from spreading to the nervous system. A single dose costs less than a dime. In a community where the polio virus would be spread through feces contact, so can the immunization be passively spread through the same mechanism. A single dose protects most recipients. Three doses protects 95% of recipients, probably for life. 100% immunity, while ideal, is not necessary to eradicate the virus, which will naturally die out if it cannot spread through a population.

COUNTERINTUITIVITY NOTE
In about 1 case per 3 million, the vaccine virus can itself cause paralysis. (A current theory is that paralysis results in recipients with existing immune deficiencies.) This risk, while devastating, is “accepted” by administering agencies as a necessary cost of saving “hundreds of thousands” of children each year from being crippled.

Counterintuitivity of Vaccination

The CDC reports 152 confirmed cases of paralytic poliomyelitis from 1980 through 1999 in the United States, an average of 8 cases per year. Six cases were acquired outside the United States and imported. The last imported case was reported in 1993. Two cases were classified as indeterminant. The remaining 144 (95%)
cases were vaccine-associated paralytic polio (VAPP) caused
by live oral polio vaccine.

In order to eliminate VAPP from the United States, ACIP recommended in 2000 that IPV be used exclusively in the United States.

Inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) was licensed in 1955 and
was used extensively from that time until the early 1960s.

Trivalent OPV was the vaccine of choice in the United States and most other countries of the world after its introduction in 1963. Use of OPV was discontinued in the United States in 2000.

Eradication Efforts

Polio was a most feared disease in industrialized countries, paralyzing thousands of children every year, until the development of vaccines in the 1960s and the beginning of routine immunization in countries around the world. From the Global Polio Eradication Initiative website:

In 1988, when the Global Polio Eradication Initiative began, polio paralysed [sic] more than 1000 children worldwide every day. Since then, 2.5 billion children have been immunized against polio thanks to the cooperation of more than 200 countries and 20 million volunteers, backed by an international investment of more than US$ 8 billion. Today, polio has been eliminated from most of the world and only four countries remain endemic. In 2009, fewer than 2000 cases were reported for the entire year.

What bad news does that terse report hide? The four endemic countries are Afghanistan, India, Nigeria, and Pakistan. But four other countries no longer on the endemic list have re-established active and persistent transmissions following an importation: Angola, Chad, Democratic Republic of Congo, and Sudan. Add to that the countries currently experiencing outbreaks due to importation (Congo, Kazakhstan, Liberia, Mali, Mauritania, and 8 others including Russia) and the challenge of containing the virus long enough to eradicate it becomes obvious.

Eradicability of Polio

Polio is a perfect candidate for eradication because the virus infects only humans, is carried in the body for a short period of time, and has an effective intervention. “We have great vaccines against polio,” says Harry Hull, chief of the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) Polio Eradication Program. The WHO-led campaign uses the oral “Sabin” vaccine because it is cheap–8 cents a dose–can be easily administered by mouth by an untrained volunteer, and produces high levels of intestinal immunity.

IMPEDIMENTS TO ERADICATION
An editorial in the journal Lancet, SEP 2006, indicates that polio vaccination campaigns have met with distrust in communities over the years. Incorrect but understandable fears that mass vaccination is a conspiracy by the developing world against poor countries complicate the efforts of volunteers to conduct one-day mass immunization efforts which have been the most effective part of the WHO plan for years. Just as important as funding, volunteers, and sufficient doses, is building trust among poor and often suspicious people through sustained efforts.

STARTLINGLY EFFECTIVE SINGLE-DAY EFFORTS
FROM THE JOURNAL SCIENCE

One early morning, millions of people across India, from the snow-peaked Himalayas to the deserts of Radjastan, set off by foot, camel, bike, car, or helicopter to run polio vaccination posts in 650,000 Indian villages. By the time this army of volunteers arrived home at the end of the day, 127 million children under the age of 5 had been immunized against this crippling disease. “Everybody said it just couldn’t happen. And, yet it does,” says Harry Hull, chief of the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) Polio Eradication Program. Initiatives such as the Polio Eradication Program show that WHO’s foot soldiers can make a huge difference to the majority of the world’s population without adequate health care.

At first, the campaign to rid the world of a disease that has left some 10 million to 20 million people paralyzed did not seem to be making an impact. But in 1995, WHO and its partner, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), adopted the new strategy of blitzing the entire child population of a country in a single day. In 1996, such National Immunization Days vaccinated more than 420 million children–almost two-thirds of the world’s children under five–against polio. These dramatic campaigns captured the imagination of the world and have even persuaded hardened fighters in war-torn countries such as Afghanistan, Sudan, and Sri Lanka to stop fighting for a day so that their children can be immunized.

Counterintuitive Setbacks

By the end of 2003, international effort had eliminated polio from all but 6 countries in the world. In the 6 remaining countries, the disease was highly localized. But a series of misunderstandings about the safety and intentions of the vaccinators shut down the campaign, caused a nationwide epidemic, and led to reinfection of many polio-free countries. For the first time in history, more countries suffered importations of polio than were actually endemic for the disease, putting the entire eradication initiative at risk.

In Kano, northern Nigeria, local leaders began theories that the vaccine contained HIV and anti-fertility agents. Very soon, the local media were reporting the popular conspiracy theory that the polio campaign was an effort to depopulate the north of the country. Within months, political leaders in Kano and adjoining states had suspended the polio campaigns; almost immediately, hundreds of children had been paralyzed as epidemic polio returned. The virus rapidly spread from Kano to the megacity of Lagos and beyond, reinfecting polio-free countries, costing over US $100 million in emergency response activities. One of Africa’s most impressive achievements in health and international cooperation was undone by a rumor.

On January 15, 2004, the leaders of the World Health Organization and UNICEF met with the health ministers of the 6 remaining polio-infected countries and 3 of the recently reinfected countries to issue the “Geneva Declaration on the Eradication of Poliomyelitis,” stating that 2004 presented the best, and possibly last, chance to achieve this global public good. The declaration introduced an aggressive plan to immunize a total of 250 million children during door-to-door polio immunization campaigns in each country within the next 12 months. The Nigerian minister outlined an extensive program of joint work with Kano state authorities to resolve the remaining doubts about the safety of the polio vaccine and then allow the resumption of the polio immunization campaigns. In 2011, polio still exists in the world. Is the present moment, once again, our “best, perhaps last, chance” to eradicate the disease?

The Nagging Autism Case

From JSPN (Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing): A decade ago, a British researcher and 12 coauthors published a paper describing abnormal gastrointestinal features among 12 children who had been referred to their clinic. All children had some type of developmental disorder, and in 9 of the children, a diagnosis of autism had been made. In 6 of the 9 autistic children, either the parent or a physician had linked the onset of developmental regression with the receipt of the MMR vaccine for measles, mumps and rubella (Wakefield et al., 1998). In 2000, a second paper was published, in which measles virus RNA fragments were found in 3 of the 9 children. (Kawashima et al., 2000). This odd, tiny, substantially anecdotal evidential link is the basis for fears persisting until today that somehow measles vaccinations cause autism.

In 2004, 10 of the 11 coauthors of Wakefield original paper asked to “formally retract the interpretation placed upon these findings . . .” However, these initial reports of a possible relationship between the MMR vaccine and the onset of autism received significant attention, and in England, measles vaccinations dropped considerably.

Working Hypothesis 1

Eradication is possible and highly desirable even if to accomplish it we need to be slightly unscrupulous.

Working Hypothesis 2

The world is too fragmented and mistrustful to ever join in a truly global effort, even to eradicate a dreaded disease.

THE SMALLPOX EXAMPLE:
A brief query of Rowan’s MEDLINE database yields 232 results for a simple search “smallpox eradication.” I suspect I’ll be able to find adequate historical information to support the theory that if any infectious disease can be eradicated from the planet (as smallpox was), then polio can be.

Topics for Smaller Papers

Distinguish Smallpox Eradication from Polio Eradication
(Definition/Classification Argument)
If there’s a class difference between polio and smallpox that interferes with this conclusion, I may be able to devote one of my smaller papers to detailing that difference, either to minimize it or to recommend a different approach for eradicating polio than was successful for smallpox.

Compulsory Vaccination Will Be Required
(Cause/Effect Argument)
Regarding the successful eradication of smallpox from the planet, an article in the May 8, 2010 Lancet offers insight I may need to use.

Force was, of course, sometimes used to achieve immunisation [sic] targets…. Organised [sic] and violent resistance during epidemics could provoke ferocious responses from vaccination teams…. Opposition to vaccination was widely regarded as being dangerous to communities in regions that had been freed from the scourge, and this was seen as sufficient justification for the use of compulsion. Compulsory vaccination schemes were implemented with the assistance of police and paramilitary forces which had considerable societal support.

Current State of the Research Paper

The thrust of my research continues to convince me that the effort to once and for all eradicate polio from the planet is a worthwhile and achievable global good. I will propose continued and even stepped-up efforts to eliminate this virus from the planet once and for all, despite excellent arguments to the contrary, for example:

  1. that the money could be used to alleviate more suffering more immediately by attacking less recalcitrant diseases;
  2. that human beings will never universally accept the necessity and efficacy of the effort and will therefore sabotage the effort;
  3. that eradication is a myth since new strains will always replace the old before the old dies out.

I feel strongly that the tiny risk of transmitted paralysis to one child in 3 million is “acceptable,” God forgive me for saying so.

I also insist that it might be necessary to compel the reluctant last however-many-thousands to submit to vaccination against their wishes. I recognize the moral dilemma, but think it might be forgivable to lie about that tiny risk if to do so put a rumor to rest that threatened the entire program.

There is much reading yet to do. Topics I’ll be investigating include the success rates of various vaccines (there are four); more opinions on the origins of the Nigerian rumor (there are many); details of the life-cycle of the poliomyelitis virus (when will we know it’s really, really gone for good?); ancillary techniques for immunization (can we use bad sanitation to our advantage?). I love the counterintuitive result that immunization can be spread accidentally the same way the virus is spread!

In-Class Exercise

To be Completed During Class WED FEB 11

Leave feedback on this post. It’s a work-in-progress, so constructive criticism is most welcome. Praise is cool, but helpful critique is even better.

Primarily, this post is a place for me to store my Notes about my reading, shaping them only enough for my own purposes, but eventually it becomes a place to organize my impressions into sections that follow a path of logical reasoning. Currently, the material is somewhere along that timeline.

You could critique by offering organization advice, or suggesting I drop certain asides, or promote a small point to major point status. Whatever you say, don’t just react to polio. Instead, react to the research, the attitudes expressed, the odds that this will make a good paper.

Posted in David Hodges, davidbdale, Modeled Writing, Professor Post, Writing Lessons | 6 Comments