Stone Money—ILoveBees

Money Is Not Real

Money does not exist, it is nothing more than a concept that our society created to acquire social status and distribute wealth with real value. Let’s put ourselves in context, around the year 500 B.C. money as such did not exist. The people of that time survived based on exchanges between the community. For example, one person had a cow and the other had a chicken and the goods were distributed, in this case, the milk that the cow produced and the eggs that the chicken produced. But if we were so good at exchanging goods and labor, why was money invented? The reason is that exchanging goods was not an efficient thing to do, since not everyone was going to want to exchange their eggs for milk or vice versa, and that is when the role of money comes into play. That led people to use money for commerce, they put a certain value on their assets and people decided if it was worth investing or not. So, if money was used as a tool to buy materials with real value, that doesn’t mean that money by itself has no value? Or does it represent nothing more than a number that alone cannot acquire any real wealth?

A clear example that supports the idea that money is nothing more than a concept is the island of Yap and its inhabitants. Yap Island is located in the western Pacific Ocean and is best known for the way it trades among its community. In the article, “The Island of Stone Money” Senior Research fellow, Milton Friedman, describes their unique currency as “large, solid, thick, stone wheels, ranging in diameter from a foot to twelve feet, having in a center a hole varying size with the diameter of the stone” or its established name, fei. According to the system that the Yapese people use, the fei can be transferred physically, placing it in their backyards as a sign of wealth or it can simply be changed ownership through a verbal agreement. That means that there can be a fair exchange of a fei and all the inhabitants of Yap can know who the owner of the fei is even if the owner has never seen or touched the fei. So the Yapese have a giant “coin” that defines their wealth and that can be obtained physically or it can never be touched or have with them physically but they still own it, does it sound familiar? Isn’t it the same as having money in our bank account? And if it is, then, is money even real?

Not necessarily, according to the NPR broadcast “How Fake Money Saved Brazil,” Chana Joffe-Walt describes how economist Edmar Bacha developed a strategic plan with his three university colleagues that would save and completely change Brazil’s economy. In 1990, Brazil was suffering from the worst economic times in its history. Prices were constantly changing, and inflation was so high that prices increased by 80% each month while the government resorted to the same plan: a new president comes in with a new plan, president freezes prices and/or bank accounts, president fails, president gets voted out or impeached, repeat. However, according to This American Life’s broadcast “The Invention of Money,” in 1992 Bacha decided to lower the creation of money and create the Unit of Real Value, a new currency that was stable, dependable, and trustworthy but not real. This caused inflation to stop and prices to remain at the same price even when the value of the URV increased. Although this fake money played an important part in Brazil’s economic improvement, the greater impact it had on the people helped the economy be in the best state possible. The concept of money had changed in people’s minds which made them at peace with their economy and their government.

The same effect had on Americans during the Great Depression. According to the History article “Bank Run,” after the market crash of 1929, people became increasingly concerned about the safety of their money. The level of concern became so high that the rich were withdrawing their investment assets from the economy and middle and lower-class people were withdrawing their money from banks and stashing it under their mattresses, leading to the bankruptcy of more than 650 banks. But was keeping money hidden what kept people rich? Even when people claimed to keep their money safe under their mattresses, that same money quickly reduced in value. In 1933, almost immediately after Franklin D. Roosevelt took office he declared a national “bank holiday,” during which all banks would remain closed until they were determined solvent by a federal inspection. After Roosevelt ensured that all banks were legitimate, he gave his famous speech where he encouraged citizens to take their money out of their banks and deposit it in the banks. Roosevelt’s words and actions helped begin the restoration process, and when the banks reopened, many depositors showed up ready to deposit their money. This not only questioned the value that people had placed on money but also how money on its own lacked any power.

This leads us to establish two conclusions: money is a concept that changes depending on the people and their conditions and the value of money as such may not exist. Even today we can constantly see how money is manipulated and presented in different formats stipulating that it contains no value. An example of this is Bitcoin, which is a digital currency that, according to the article, “The bubble bursts on e-currency Bitcoin,” is a very uncertain company. This is because the way to acquire a bitcoin is very complex, also unlike ordinary currency, bitcoin lacks a specific limit, which leads buyers to lose real wealth such as houses, cars, etc. That said, the value of money is based on our society, but money as such does not guarantee us real wealth. Real wealth is created when we build something, grow something, mine something, or own something more than a number on a piece of paper or on a screen.

References

Friedman, Milton. “The Island of Stone Money.” The Island of Stone Money(1991): 3-7. Web. 10 Sept. 2016.

Glass, Ira, Chana Joffe-Walt, Alex Blumberg, and Dave Kestenbaum. “423: The Invention of Money.” This American Life. Prod. Planet Money. 7 Jan. 2011. This American Life. Web. 11 Sept. 2016.

Joffe-Walt, Chana. “How Fake Money Saved Brazil.” NPR. NPR, 4 Oct. 2010. Web. 13 Sept. 2016.

Renaut, Anne, “The bubble bursts on e-currency Bitcoin” AFP News, 13 April 2013

History.com Editors, “Bank Run” HISTORY, April 23, 2010 

Posted in ILoveBees, Stone Money | 1 Comment

Stone Money-Temporal

Money: Just a Way to Keep Score

My thinking on the concept of money has not changed drastically. I, and I am sure others, were already familiar with the idea that money does not have a non-assigned intrinsic value, that it’s essentially an agreed upon system on which to keep track of purchases and labor and such. However, what I did come to realize was that an essential part of money that allows agreement of the system to happen in the first place entails more nuance than just an agreement itself, it requires a faith that the system will uphold.

In a game, like a sport or a video game, we keep track of progress by quantifying it as points or touchdowns. To my previous understanding, that’s exactly what money is, it’s a real-life point system used to give an easy numerical value to your contribution to society, in order to keep track of it. When you score a touchdown in football, you don’t get a “thing”, we just agree that you are now doing better by a discrete value of 6, and as long as everyone in fact does agree to that, and to whichever specific point system you may be using as a whole, then you indeed now have a value of 6. Now a field goal, on the other hand, is not as hard and is not as valuable to the progress of the game, so we’ll give it a lesser numerical value of 3. Similarly, in real life, we will give a good or service that’s not deemed as valuable a lesser number relative to those that are more valuable. As long as everyone agrees on the means of keeping track of these quantities, whether it be giant rocks, pieces of paper, or electronic signals in a computer, then they have value, because they are serving the role of quantifying and keeping track of value. 

Online in game currencies work relatively the same way. They aren’t much more abstract than bitcoin, and not much more abstract than physical currency either for that matter. Both serve the same general purpose of a point system used for keeping track of contribution or progress that allow for the purchase of products.

The idea of labeling gold in a vault, or painting a cross on a rock are essentially the same. The seemingly meaningless acts are representation of people asserting their authority or possession of the goods and services that they represent. The people of Yap accepted this assertion by giving up their services through making the roads and highways that the German people demanded. In this and many other cases, the authority was not earned through contribution to society, but rather taken by force. So it’s not the labeling of stones or moving gold from one drawer to another that people freak out about, it’s the new authority that is crowned through this symbolic gesture.

Now like anything, there are still going to be important comparisons and contradictions between the different forms of currency. Let’s take crypto and physical currency, for example. While they are seemingly the same in concept, they can differ in practice. Some cryptocurrencies like bitcoin have been shown to be more volatile than other currencies. For example, as noted in AFP News in 2013, “The price of the virtual “geek” currency had soared through the stratosphere in recent weeks, trading for a high of $266 on Wednesday — only to come hurtling back to Earth in just three days. By Friday, a single Bitcoin was worth just $54.” Volatility is not unique to crypto, however. There have of course been many cases of physical money, such as paper money, going through the roof for example, the German mark in the 1920s, for example, had skyrocketed post WW1. As Weidenhammer noted in The American Economic Review, “In November, 1923, forty two billion marks were worth but a single American cent.” So, while crypto may very well be volatile, we mustn’t forget that any other currency is susceptible to the same volatility, based on the circumstances that arise (in this case, the great war).

However, this does not mean that currencies that lack a commodity cannot work. In 1980s Brazil, the way they fixed the economy was through a “fake” currency, the URV. Now, they say it was fake, in the sense that it did not physically exist, but in concept and in practice it was as real as any other currency, because it was a point system that everyone agreed on, and trusted. As Joffe-Walt 2010 put it, “You have to slow down the creation of money, they explained. But, just as important, you have to stabilize people’s faith in money itself.  People have to be tricked into thinking money will hold its value.” Any type of currency can work, as long as people agree and trust its value.

We seem to like to contrast our money with the people of Yap’s Money, but I don’t think that our currency would seem that strange to them. It shouldn’t take long for them to come to the same understanding as us that the object representing currency is completely arbitrary, as long as it’s agreed upon; it didn’t take us very long, why should it be different for them? I mean, who, as a child, didn’t realize that a piece of paper doesn’t actually do anything? They will probably find our electronic currency to be difficult to understand because of its abstractness, however that would just be due to a larger misunderstanding of modern technology in general. Our paper money might just seem too lacking in visible beauty and craftsmanship to seem to have value.

References

Friedman, Milton. “The Island of Stone Money.” The Island of Stone Money(1991): 3-7. Web. 10 Sept. 2016

Joffe-Walt, Chana. “How Fake Money Saved Brazil.” NPR. 4 Oct. 2010. 

Renaut, Anne, “The bubble bursts on e-currency Bitcoin” AFP News, 13 April 2013

Weidenhammer, R. (1932). [Review of Exchange, Prices and Production in Hyperinflation: Germany, 1920-1923, by F. D. Graham]. The American Economic Review, 22(1), 146–149. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1807287

Posted in Stone Money, Temporal | 1 Comment

My Hypothesis- Webbwrestler135

1- Combat Sports/Violent Crimes

2- Combat Sport Athletes and Violent Crimes

3- Combat Sport Athletes committing Violent Crimes

4- Combat Sport Athletes committing violent crimes, compared to non combat sport athletes committing violent crimes

5- Does learning a fighting style or violent sport create more of a likely hood of committing a violent crime rather than an athlete not in a combative sport?

6- Competing in a combative sport creates more of a likely hood of committing a violent crime rather than an athlete who competes in a non-violent sport.

Posted in My Hypothesis, WebbWrestler | Leave a comment

My hypothesis-Thatpersonoverthere

1 Drawing and emotions

2 Drawing and calmness

3 The effects on coloring pages on people with depression

4Intricate coloring pages with pastel color schemes can help people with depression by giving them something to do

5 Intricate coloring pages with pastel coloring schemes can help people with depression because giving someone something to do can help them to forget their feeling

6 Intricate coloring pages with pastel coloring schemes can be helpful to time management and better a person mental health better than traditional therapy.

Posted in My Hypothesis, ThatPersonOverThere | 1 Comment

My Hypothesis- Breakingbad45

  1. College students and their mental health
  2. College students dealing with depression.
  3. Discovering the exact reason why college students have a soaring depression rate when attending college originally. 
  4. A lack of self-care and having an unhealthy lifestyle are risk factors for stress and anxiety among students. A lack of self-care can cause a sense of guilt which can pose another risk factor.
  5. Colleges and Universities can cause mental health problems when you need to deal with management issues and struggle with taking care of yourself day to day can make it hard on students at a new university. 
  6. If you are willing to take control of your management skills and willing to try to change your lifestyle to be productive, college can be less stressful leading more incoming and new students to be less stressed and have to deal with less anxiety, therefore having more students having their mental health and struggles dealt with.
Posted in BreakingBad, My Hypothesis | 1 Comment

My Hypothesis- Calm&Patient

  1. Mindfulness has potential benefits.
  2. Mindfulness stands out as a promising approach to enhancing well-being.
  3. Research suggests that mindfulness can positively impact mental health.
  4. Mindfulness may be particularly effective in alleviating symptoms of anxiety.
  5. Mindfulness interventions have shown promise in improving focus and attention.
  6. Hypothesizing a direct link, we propose that regular mindfulness practice can significantly reduce anxiety levels, enhance attention span, and contribute to overall mental well-being in individuals facing chronic health conditions.
  7. Have a Conference
Posted in Calm&Patient, My Hypothesis | 1 Comment

My Hypothesis-Hockeyfan1234

  1. Hockey is dangerous 
  2. Hockey is the most dangerous sport 
  3. Hockey has caused more serious injuries than any other sport 
  4. Hockey has caused life threatening injuries such as death due to the lack of gear and dirty plays 
  5. The lack of safer gear in Hockey and bad plays by the players causes serious injuries such as loss of teeth, spinal injuries, and death 
  6. Hockey is an enjoyable sport to watch but it is played very dirty, the lack of gear around the neck is dangerous, and there are no serious penalties given when a player is thrown around badly enough to where they are injured. If we had more regulation and better safety the sport would still be enjoyable and less injuries would occur.
Posted in HockeyFan, My Hypothesis | 1 Comment

My Hypothesis – SleepyCat

  1. Stray cats are bad.
  2. Stray cats are negatively impacting the environment.
  3. Because of the influx of stray cats, many native wildlife species are being affected.
  4. Free-roaming cats are the reason native bird species have gone extinct on islands.
  5. On islands where cats aren’t native, they hunt seabirds because there are not enough natural resources in the environment.
  6. An increase in the population of free-roaming cats on islands where they are not native with the addition of a decrease in fauna populations has caused the free-roaming cats to prey upon seabirds; therefore causing some species to come close to endangerment.
Posted in My Hypothesis, SleepyCat | 2 Comments

My Hypothesis –Gymrat27

  1. social media is negative for society.
  2. social media is negative for society’s mental health.
  3. being on social media less will help society have better mental health.
  4. If you open social media less throughout the day, you will feel better about yourself.
  5. being less on social media makes your mind more open to doing more things and not focus on comparing yourself to false reality
  6. Social media’s portrayal of others on the platform worsens body dysmorphia, creating more self-criticism and having people develop an avoidance behavior, eventually impacting mental health and social interactions associated with body image.
Posted in GymRat, My Hypothesis | Leave a comment

My Hypothesis – ExcellentStudent27

  1. Overtime Rules in the NFL.
  2. Immediate sudden death in overtime of NFL games.
  3. Giving both teams a chance to win, even if the first team scores in overtime of an NFL game.
  4. Implementing a timed overtime (an extra session of 15 minutes) in overtime of an NFL game rather than the first team to score would be more fair to both teams.
  5. Implementing rules similar to a shootout in hockey will be more fair to both teams in the case of overtime in an NFL game.
  6. Implementing NCAA Football overtime rules to NFL overtimes, including an extra section (15 extra minutes of play time) and a shootout if both teams stay tied after the extra time, would be more entertaining to fans and be more fair to both teams rather than relying on the first touchdown to be scored to decide the game.
Posted in ExcellentStudent, My Hypothesis | 1 Comment