A.  “Wec says that Bosch Tool “colluded with its competitors” to develop their own version, and continued to sell their dangerous table and miter saws.”

B.

• First: This claim that Bosch colluded with his competitors
• Second: It also claims that the reason for collusion was to develop their own miter and table saws
• Third: The second claim has a claim that the colluders are going to have the same idea.
• Fourth: It its assumed that Bosch Tool and their competitors will continue to sell their saws and stay in business
• Fifth: It is claimed that Bosch Tool’s tables and saws are dangerous
• Sixth: It is a claim that competitors and Bosch Tool were selling their own version of saws separately

C

• The first claim is a casual claim that states Bosch Tool colluded with its competitors to come up with a solution
• The second claim is a casual claim because the competitors and Bosch Tools are going to get together to come up with an idea for their own saw
• The third claim is casual claim because coming with the same version the competitors and Bosch Tool are going to make or stop something as an effect
• The fourth claim is factual because they colluded to in order to create a different version and benefit the business in the future
• All the incidents and warnings about the saw make the fifth claim factual
• The sixth claim is a factual claim because the competitors and Bosch Tool would not get together if they were selling the same product.

D