7A. “Today’s unanimous vote by the Commission to approve an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) on table saw blade contact injuries should send a clear signal to consumers and the industry”

7B. The claim is that the vote of the ANPR’s Commission sends a clear signal to consumers and industry

7C. This is a causal claim since the Commission of ANPR says that because of the unanimous vote that sends out a clear signal to customers and the tool making industry.

7D. The accuracy of the claim is low, not because it is a false claim, but since it is more of an opinionated claim accuracy of the claim is more or less non-existent. The claim is low quality because it is based on the assumption that the Commission of ANPR would send a clear signal to the consumers and industry. The logic of the claim is evident, one would hope that a unanimous vote would open the eyes of people and see that the Commission holds a lot of power. Going back to the “clear signal” bit from the claim.