Money seems to have a big role in our society; you can’t do much or get far if you don’t have any. Money is valuable in different ways, even when you don’t see it physically. In today’s society you must have faith in the government, in the banking system, that your money is being handled with in the proper manner, if not then you would be hiding all of your money under your mattress, or around your house. I never really have a clue what happens in the banks, and how they take care of your money. I always just thought money was quite simple; you either have some or you don’t, that’s it. However, by being introduced to this assignment and having it compare the Yap Fei with the US and France gold trade in 1933, and the Brazilian cruzeros all seemed somewhat similar. No one actually sees their money being transferred. When you get paid, you don’t get a check or get paid even in cash, it’s all directly transferred to your bank account, and that you just have to trust that you got more money.
After reading through this assignment and listening about it during class, I realized that money can just be a big scam if you don’t have any faith and confidence. The Yap never got to see that one stone that was considered the greatest above all the stones. It was sitting somewhere at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean, yet the natives still took their word. They didn’t see the limestone but the family still got the value that it is worth. Now looking at the Yap’s perspective, I believe that they would think our monetary system is completely out of the ordinary. While they have stones in front of their properties, we have pieces of paper that represent our wealth.
The Germans decided that they didn’t like the pathways on the island of Yap, so they marked black X’s on the stones to show that it actually belonged to the German government. Once the pathways were formed into nice roads and highways, the Germans scrubbed off the X’s and the Yaps felt as if they had their value back. This is quite similar to what the French had asked for. In 1933, the French wanted to trade United States dollars for gold, thinking they it will be worth much more, since gold doesn’t lose its value. But they did not want to spend any more money on the shipment of the gold, so they simply asked the US if their gold can be put into a separate drawer in the federal reserve bank labeled that it belonged to the French. This shows how much trust and faith that people have for keeping someone’s wealth. By the French not actually having their gold, they know that it is in that drawer, and the Yaps not having their stone, they know that it is still their stone.
Only about twenty years ago Brazil thought it was doing its country a favor by building a new capital, but little did they know they were putting their country into an economic nightmare. In just one month, Brazil’s inflation reached 80% meaning more money was printed, and more money people were trying to spend. In NPR story about Brazil they mention how 80% inflation impacted daily spendings. They said that one day eggs would cost $1, and the next day it would cost $1.02. However if inflation continued, by the end of the year it would cost $1,000. This really amazed me and it got me thinking how people could live like this with the prices always rising everyday. Brazil was convinced that the government was helpless to control inflation. But out of some miracle, Brazil had one bizarre plan that they hoped would work. They constructed a fake currency that would trick the people of Brazil into thinking it was a new currency called “URV” unit of real value. People would still have cruzeros but everything would be listed in URV’s. The Brazilians slowly understood the concept of the URV. It created stability within the country and it gave value to their money.
Works Cited
“The Friday Podcast: A Giant Stone Coin At The Bottom Of The Sea.” NPR. NPR, n.d. Web. 01 Feb. 2015. <http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2011/02/15/131963928/the-friday-podcast-a-giant-stone-coin-at-the-bottom-of-the-sea>.
Joffe-Walt, Chana. “How Fake Money Saved Brazil.” NPR. NPR, n.d. Web. 01 Feb. 2015. <http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2010/10/04/130329523/how-fake-money-saved-brazil>.
Friedman, Milton. The Island of Stone Money. Stanford University: Hoover Institution, 1991. N. pag. Print.
Goldstein, Jacob, and David Kestenbaum. “The Island Of Stone Money.” NPR. NPR, 10 Dec. 2010. Web. 01 Feb. 2015. <http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2011/02/15/131934618/the-island-of-stone-money>.
Feedback was requested.
Feedback provided. —DSH
LikeLike
Hey, qdoba. I’m glad you’ve started requesting feedback before the midway point in the semester. Let’s get started.
P1. The ban on 2nd person means we don’t use you, your, or yours in our essays for this class. I’ve highlighted many uses you’ll need to correct. The most permanent way to avoid them is to write sentences that don’t have so many pronouns in them. Those you can’t avoid can be swapped out for we.
You have the germ of a good idea here, qdoba. You and I know you’re going to compare the many cultures that have expressed their faith in their own money (and times they doubted in currency). You say yourself here that we express faith in our government when we work for money and get paid through mysterious processes that change numbers in our bank accounts. So to introduce your essay, make an organized presentation of how the US economy runs on fictional money. Make readers feel how very odd it is that we don’t actually handle the stuff we think is so important any more. That’s your theme, after all. (Don’t forget to make it about us not you.
P2. A scam is a deliberate attempt to cheat someone out of value. That’s not what money is, even if it’s based on faith alone. Maybe you mean sham.
A basic problem in this post is that readers unfamiliar with the background readings won’t have a clue what’s going on, qdoba. Imagine reading your claim about the big stone at the bottom of the ocean if you hadn’t heard the Stone Money broadcast. In as few words as possible, provide the context for your background material that helps readers understand your argument.
“The natives still took their word” is vague for a different reason. We don’t know if the natives are the Yap, whose word they took, or what they professed to believe.
You went out of your way to claim that we don’t get cash or checks on payday, qdoba. Now in the Yap paragraph, you say we have pieces of paper, by which I assume you mean dollar bills. You might mean bank statements, but the majority of those aren’t paper any more either. Whatever you mean, you need to be clearer.
P3. Again, not having heard the broadcast would completely disable understanding for any reader here. I would think the Germans painted the pathway stones with Xs, for example. I don’t think I’d be able to understand the French gold example either.
I understand the challenge of providing background information without long quotations, but that’s the challenge of all research papers, and the reason we practice this skill. It’s the rationale behind the Purposeful Summaries exercise. See what you can do.
P4. You do a pretty good job of it in the Brazil example, qdoba. We might not need all the details, but we get the concept of a currency swap, sort of. You could shorthand the explanation by focusing on the primary lesson: when a population loses faith in the stability or value of its currency, drastic measures are required to avert disaster. In the Yap case, the painting and erasing of Xs (seizure and return); in the French case, the trading of dollars for gold (swapping one currency for another); in the Brazilian case, the transition of one currency into another.
I hope you find this helpful, qdoba.
I await your reaction and your revisions.
Grade Code 9D4
Grades are decoded at Professor Conferences
LikeLike